Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jun 1;141(6):1089-1097.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005180. Epub 2023 May 3.

Cesarean Delivery Rate in Nulliparous Women in the Second Stage of Labor When Using Zhang Compared With Friedman Labor Curves: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Maria M Limas  1 , Sohum C Shah, Mark A Turrentine
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Cesarean Delivery Rate in Nulliparous Women in the Second Stage of Labor When Using Zhang Compared With Friedman Labor Curves: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Maria M Limas et al. Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the cesarean delivery rate in the second stage of labor in nulliparous women when using the Zhang compared with the Friedman labor curve by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources: We explored MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies comparing the cesarean delivery rate in the second stage of labor in nulliparous women when using the Zhang compared with the Friedman labor curve.

Methods of study selection: Two reviewers separately ascertained studies, obtained data, and gauged study quality. The cesarean delivery rate was compared, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were estimated.

Tabulation, integration, and results: Five retrospective cohort studies and two randomized controlled trials were identified with 20,165 nulliparous women (10,861 with the Zhang labor curve vs 9,304 with the Freidman labor curve). Studies evaluated women with delivery from June 2010 to May 2017. Two studies were from the United States; two were from Israel; and one each was from China, France, and Norway. The median point prevalence of cesarean delivery in the second stage was 4.0% (95% CI 2.1-14.5%) in cases managed with the Zhang labor curve compared with 5.6% (95% CI 1.8-28.6%) in cases managed with the Friedman labor curves. The overall cesarean delivery rate in the second stage of labor was similar when the Zhang labor curve compared with the Friedman labor curve was used (pooled OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.47-1.57, I2=93%). When the two randomized controlled trials were excluded, the results of the cohort studies continued to demonstrate that the overall cesarean delivery rate in the second stage of labor was similar (pooled OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.42-1.69, I2=92%).

Conclusion: Nulliparous women have similar cesarean delivery rates in the second stage of labor when either the Zhang or Friedman labor curve is used.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42022346425.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure The authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:693–711. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000444441.04111.1d - DOI
    1. Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, Burkman R, Haberman S, Gregory KD, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1281–7. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6e - DOI
    1. Friedman EA. Primigravid labor: a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1955;6:567–89. doi: 10.1097/00006250-195512000-00001 - DOI
    1. Friedman EA, Sachtleben MR. Station of the fetal presenting part VI: arrest of descent in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 1976;47:129–36.
    1. Gimovsky AC, Berghella V. Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:361.e1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.042 - DOI