Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 1;51(11):1552-1565.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005967. Epub 2023 Jun 14.

Flow-Sizing Critical Care Resources

Collaborators, Affiliations

Flow-Sizing Critical Care Resources

Joseph L Nates et al. Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the factors affecting critical care capacity and how critical care organizations (CCOs) within academic centers in the U.S. flow-size critical care resources under normal operations, strain, and surge conditions.

Data sources: PubMed, federal agency and American Hospital Association reports, and previous CCO survey results were reviewed.

Study selection: Studies and reports of critical care bed capacity and utilization within CCOs and in the United States were selected.

Data extraction: The Academic Leaders in the Critical Care Medicine Task Force established regular conference calls to reach a consensus on the approach of CCOs to "flow-sizing" critical care services.

Data synthesis: The approach of CCOs to "flow-sizing" critical care is outlined. The vertical (relation to institutional resources, e.g., space allocation, equipment, personnel redistribution) and horizontal (interdepartmental, e.g., emergency department, operating room, inpatient floors) integration of critical care delivery (ICUs, rapid response) for healthcare organizations and the methods by which CCOs flow-size critical care during normal operations, strain, and surge conditions are described. The advantages, barriers, and recommendations for the rapid and efficient scaling of critical care operations via a CCO structure are explained. Comprehensive guidance and resources for the development of "flow-sizing" capability by a CCO within a healthcare organization are provided.

Conclusions: We identified and summarized the fundamental principles affecting critical care capacity. The taskforce highlighted the advantages of the CCO governance model to achieve rapid and cost-effective "flow-sizing" of critical care services and provide recommendations and resources to facilitate this capability. The relevance of a comprehensive approach to "flow-sizing" has become particularly relevant in the wake of the latest COVID-19 pandemic. In light of the growing risks of another extreme epidemic, planning for adequate capacity to confront the next critical care crisis is urgent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Halpern received funding from Werfen and Airstrip Technologies. Dr. Jacobi received funding from La Jolla Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Hospital Products Division, AcelRx, Society of Critical Care Medicine LEAD and Glycemic Guidelines Co-Chair, BD Voices of Vascular Educational Advisor, Visante, Infusion Nurses Society, and Postgraduate Healthcare Education. Dr. Pastores’ institution received funding from Biomerieux, RevImmune, and Eisai/Global Coalition for Adaptive Research; he received funding from McGraw Hill. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Factors affecting critical care capacity. APPs = advanced practice providers, CRNAs = certified registered nurse anesthetists, ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, EHR = electronic health record, ER = emergency department, HFOT = high-flow oxygen therapy, IMU = intermediate medical unit, PACU = post-anesthesia care unit, PPE = personal protective equipment, PT = patient, RN = registered nurse, RTs = respiratory therapists.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Tele-ICU and tele-critical care service under normal and surge conditions.

Comment in

References

    1. Pastores SM, Halpern NA, Oropello JM, et al.: Critical care organizations in academic medical centers in North America. Crit Care Med 2015; 43:2239–2244 - PubMed
    1. Moore JE, Oropello JM, Stoltzfus D, et al.; Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine (ALCCM) Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine: Critical care organizations: Building and integrating academic programs. Crit Care Med 2018; 46:e334–e341 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lilly CM, Oropello JM, Pastores SM, et al.; Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine: Workforce, workload, and burnout in critical care organizations: Survey results and research agenda. Crit Care Med 2020; 48:1565–1571 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leung S, Pastores SM, Oropello JM, et al.; Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine: Regionalization of critical care in the United States: Current state and proposed framework from the Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Crit Care Med 2022; 50:37–49 - PubMed
    1. Pastores SM, Kvetan V, Coopersmith CM, et al.; Academic Leaders in Critical Care Medicine (ALCCM) Task Force of the Society of the Critical Care Medicine: Workforce, workload, and burnout among intensivists and advanced practice providers: A narrative review. Crit Care Med 2019; 47:550–557 - PubMed

Publication types