Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct 1;34(10):1709-1720.
doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000172. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

Research and Nonresearch Industry Payments to Nephrologists in the United States between 2014 and 2021

Affiliations

Research and Nonresearch Industry Payments to Nephrologists in the United States between 2014 and 2021

Anju Murayama et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. .

Abstract

Significance statement: Concerns about the financial relationships between nephrologists and the health care industry have been reported in the United States over the past decade. However, since the 2014 launch of the federal transparency database, Open Payments, few documents have explored the whole picture of research and nonresearch payments to US nephrologists from industry sources. In this study, the authors found that 87% of nephrologists have received nonresearch payments, and the aggregate amount of these payments has been increasing since 2014. Only 12% of nephrologists received research payments; these recipients were disproportionately male. In addition, the top 5% of nephrologists receiving nonresearch funds received 81% of all such payments. Nonresearch payments were larger among male nephrologists than among female nephrologists and increased by 8% annually among male nephrologists between 2014 and 2019.

Background: Financial relationships between nephrologists and the health care industry have been a concern in the United States over the past decade.

Methods: To evaluate industry payments to nephrologists, we conducted a cross-sectional study examining nonresearch and research payments to all US nephrologists registered in the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System between 2014 and 2021, using the Open Payments database. Payment data were descriptively analyzed on the basis of monetary value, and payment trends were evaluated by using a generalized estimating equations model.

Results: From 2014 through 2021, 10,463 of 12,059 nephrologists (87%) received at least one payment from the US health care industry, totaling $778 million. The proportion of nephrologists who did not receive nonresearch payments varied each year, ranging from 38% to 51%. Nonresearch payments comprised 22% ($168 million) of overall industry payments in monetary value but 87% in the number of payments. Among those receiving payments, the median per-physician 8-year aggregated payment values were $999 in nonresearch payments and $102,329 in associated research payments. Male nephrologists were more likely than female nephrologists to receive research payments, but the per-physician amount did not differ. However, nonresearch payments were three times larger for male nephrologists and increased by 8% annually between 2014 and 2019 among male nephrologists but remained stable among female nephrologists. The top 5% of nephrologists receiving nonresearch payments received 81% of all such payments.

Conclusions: Between 2014 and 2021, 87% of US nephrologists received at least one payment from the health care industry. Notably, nonresearch payments to nephrologists have been increasing since the Open Payments database's 2014 launch. Male nephrologists were more likely than female nephrologists to receive research payments.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A. Ozaki received personal fees for consulting work from Medical Network Systems, a diagnostic company developing diagnostic artificial intelligence in Japan. A. Ozaki also reports Consultancy: MNES Inc.; Research Funding: Daiwa Angro-Japanese Foundation, Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Sasakawa Health Foundation, and Seizon Kagaku Foundation; Honoraria: Kyowa Kirin Inc. and Taiho Pharmaceutical Inc.; and Advisory or Leadership Role: Japan Society for Medical Education. H. Saito received personal fees for giving a lecture not related to CME from Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. All remaining authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Concentration of general payments to nephrologists between 2014 and 2021. General payments for royalties and licenses were excluded from the analysis of payment concentration.

References

    1. Tringale KR, Marshall D, Mackey TK, Connor M, Murphy JD, Hattangadi-Gluth JA. Types and distribution of payments from industry to physicians in 2015. JAMA. 2017;317(17):1774–1784. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.3091 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pakanati AR, Kovvuru K, Thombre V, Kanduri SR, Nalleballe K, Ranabothu S. Industry payments to nephrologists in the United States. Cureus. 2021;13(8):e17057. doi:10.7759/cureus.17057 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahn R Woodbridge A Abraham A, et al. . Financial ties of principal investigators and randomized controlled trial outcomes: cross sectional study. BMJ. 2017;356:i6770. doi:10.1136/bmj.i6770 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fickweiler F, Fickweiler W, Urbach E. Interactions between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry generally and sales representatives specifically and their association with physicians' attitudes and prescribing habits: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):e016408. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016408 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mitchell AP Trivedi NU Gennarelli RL, et al. . Are financial payments from the pharmaceutical industry associated with physician prescribing?: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174(3):353–361. doi:10.7326/M20-5665 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources