Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 13;8(3):97.
doi: 10.3390/jfmk8030097.

Self-Efficacy and the Digit Ratio in a Group of Sports University Students

Simona Massimino  1 , Sergio Rinella  2 , Claudia Savia Guerrera  2 , Donatella Di Corrado  3 , Romina Astuto  2 , Alessia Sorbello  3 , Francesca Reina  2 , Vincenzo Perciavalle  4 , Andrea Buscemi  5 , Marinella Coco  2
Affiliations

Self-Efficacy and the Digit Ratio in a Group of Sports University Students

Simona Massimino et al. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. .

Abstract

Self-efficacy is one's awareness of being able to cope optimally with different situations. Perceived self-efficacy is a belief that closely involves emotional and personological functioning. In fact, when one perceives oneself as capable, the likelihood of success increases significantly. The aim of this research was to verify a possible correlation between self-efficacy and the Digit Ratio (2D:4D), referred to as prenatal androgen levels, and whether these correlate with some psychological variables, considering possible gender differences. This study involved 56 sports university students, whose 2D:4D ratio was calculated. Moreover, self-assessment questionnaires: the Self-efficacy Scale (SES), the Big Five Questionnaire-2 (BFQ-2), the Profile of Mood State (POMS), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory Form Y (STAI-Y) and the Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) were administered. The data show that the perceived levels of self-efficacy seem to be influenced by an innate predisposition linked to prenatal androgen values to which the subjects were exposed during uterine life (2D:4D). This negative correlation indicates that the higher the value of the digit ratio, the more likely it is that the level of perceived self-efficacy will be lower. Finally, the degree of perceived self-efficacy also seems to depend on the levels of subjective anxiety, understood both as a personological disposition and a contingent condition, and the latter also seems to be influenced by prenatal androgen levels, particularly in women.

Keywords: emotion control; gender differences; personality; state–trait anxiety; testosterone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation between digit ratio (2D:4D), (a) Self-efficacy and (b) Emotional Stability (BFQ-2) in the entire sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between digit ratio (2D:4D) and both State (a) and Trait Anxiety (b) of STAI-Y in the female sample.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation between Self-Efficacy and Cognitive Reappraisal (ERQ) in the entire sample.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlation between Self-efficacy and both State (a) and Trait Anxiety (b) of STAI-Y in the entire sample.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Correlation between Self-efficacy and Energy (a), Emotional Stability (b) and Openness (c) of BGQ-2 in the entire sample.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Correlations between State–Trait Anxiety (STAI-Y), Energy (a,b), Emotional Stability (c,d) and Openness (e) of BFQ-2 in the entire sample.
Figure 7
Figure 7
On the left are the mean values of Self-efficacy (a) and on the right are the mean values of Emotional Suppression (ERQ) (b), both in male and female samples; * p < 0.05, statistically significant difference.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kirsch I. Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy. In: Maddux J.E., editor. Self-Efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research and Application. Plenum; New York, NY, USA: 1995. pp. 331–345.
    1. Maddux J.E., Gosselin J.T. Self-efficacy. In: Leary M.R., Tangney J.P., editors. Handbook of Self and Identity. Guilford Press; New York, NY, USA: 2003. pp. 218–237.
    1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The foundation of agency. In: Walter J.P., Alexander G., editors. Control of Human Behavior, Mental Processes, and Consciousness: Essays in Honor of the 60th Birthday of August Flammer. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass; Mahwah, NJ, USA: 2000. pp. 17–34.
    1. Ehrenberg M.F., Cox D.N., Koopman R.F. The relationship between self-efficacy and depression in adolescents. Adolescence. 1991;26:361. - PubMed
    1. Whyte G., Saks A., Hook S. When success breeds failure: The role of perceived self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action. J. Organ. Behav. 1997;18:415–432. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199709)18:5<415::AID-JOB813>3.0.CO;2-G. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources