The Role of Radiation Therapy in Adult and Pediatric Keloid Management: A National Survey of Radiation Oncologists
- PMID: 37489962
- DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003609
The Role of Radiation Therapy in Adult and Pediatric Keloid Management: A National Survey of Radiation Oncologists
Abstract
Introduction: Radiation therapy is a promising modality for treating keloids after surgical excision. However, it is currently not standard practice among physicians because of concern surrounding the risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers, especially among pediatric patients. There is minimal research assessing the complications for radiation therapy in keloid management.
Aim: The goal of this study was to determine radiation oncologists' perspectives about the utility and appropriateness of radiation therapy for keloid management in both adult and pediatric patients. This study also aimed to characterize radiation modality, dose, fractionation, and secondary complications observed by providers.
Methods: An electronic survey was delivered to 3102 members of the American Society for Radiation Oncology. The survey subjects were radiation oncologists who are currently practicing in the United States. Rates of responses were analyzed.
Results: A total of 114 responses from practicing radiation oncologists were received. Of these, 113 providers (99.1%) supported radiation therapy for keloid management in adults, whereas only 54.9% supported radiation therapy for pediatric patients. Of 101 providers that treated adults in the past year, the majority used external beam: electrons (84.2%), applied 3 fraction regimens (54.4%), and delivered radiation within 24 hours postexcision (45.5%). In pediatric patients, only 42 providers reported treating at least 1 patient. The majority used electron beam radiation (76.2%), applied 3 faction regimens (65%), and delivered radiation on the same day of keloid excision (50.0%) The main concern when treating pediatric patients were risk of secondary malignancy (92.1%).
Conclusion: Although radiation therapy appears to be a widely accepted adjuvant treatment option for adults with keloids, the use of radiation therapy for pediatric patients is less widely accepted because of concerns regarding secondary malignancy. The findings suggest additional studies need to be carried out to assess the risk of those complications.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared.
References
-
- Bayat A, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW. Skin scarring. BMJ . 2003;326:88–92.
-
- Bijlard E, Kouwenberg CA, Timman R, et al. Burden of keloid disease: a cross-sectional health-related quality of life assessment. Acta Derm Venereol . 2017;97:225–229.
-
- Sun LM, Wang KH, Lee YCG. Keloid incidence in Asian people and its comorbidity with other fibrosis-related diseases: a nationwide population-based study. Arch Dermatol Res . 2014;306:803–808.
-
- Cosman B, Wolff M. Correlation of keloid recurrence with completeness of local excision: a negative report. Plast Reconstr Surg . 1972;50:163–166.
-
- Wong TS, Li JZH, Chen S, et al. The efficacy of triamcinolone acetonide in keloid treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Med . 2016;3:71.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous