Correspondence
- PMID: 37490754
- DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003853
Correspondence
Comment in
-
Reply.Retina. 2023 Sep 1;43(9):e55-e56. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003854. Retina. 2023. PMID: 37263183 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
360 DEGREE ENDOLASER VERSUS FOCAL ENDOLASER IN PRIMARY RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT REPAIR.Retina. 2022 Nov 1;42(11):2046-2050. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003599. Retina. 2022. PMID: 35982506
References
-
- Mathai M, Godwin KS, Albarracin J, et al. 360 degree endolaser versus focal endolaser in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Retina 2022;42:2046–2050.
-
- Wang JC, Ryan EH, Ryan C, et al. Factors associated with the use of 360-degree laser retinopexy during primary vitrectomy with or without scleral buckle for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment and impact on surgical outcomes (pro study report number 4). Retina 2019;40:2070–2076.
-
- Dirani A, Antaki F, Rhéaume MA, et al. 360-degree intra-operative laser retinopexy for the prevention of retinal re-detachment in patients treated with primary pars plana vitrectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2020;258:249–256.
-
- Soekamto C, Chu ER, Johnson DA, et al. Protective role of 360° laser retinopexy in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Ophthalmol 2021;35:215–222.
-
- Antaki F, Dirani A, Bachour K, et al. Comment on: localized versus 360° intraoperative laser retinopexy in cases of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with mild-to-moderate grade proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Eye (Lond) 2021;35:3174–3175.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
