Using an electronic safety netting tool designed to improve safety with respect to cancer referral in primary care: a qualitative service evaluation using rapid appraisal methods
- PMID: 37491106
- PMCID: PMC10373707
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002354
Using an electronic safety netting tool designed to improve safety with respect to cancer referral in primary care: a qualitative service evaluation using rapid appraisal methods
Abstract
Background: This evaluation assesses the impact of an electronic safety netting software (E-SN) package, C the Signs, in primary care services across five boroughs in North East London (NEL).
Aim: This study evaluates the use of E-SN software in primary care, examining its benefits and barriers, safety implications, and overall impact on individual and practice usage.
Design and setting: The study is based on semi-structured interviews with 21 clinical and non-clinical members of staff from all primary care services using the software in NEL.
Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather data on individual use of the software, safety implications and practice use of features such as the monitoring dashboard. Data were analysed using a rapid qualitative methodology.
Results: Two approaches to E-SN software adoption were reported: whole practice adoption and self-directed use. Practices benefitted from shared responsibility for safety netting and using software to track patients' progress in secondary care. Adoption was affected by information technology and administrative resources. Decision-support tools were used infrequently due to a lack of appreciation for their benefits. Selective adoption of different E-SN functions restricted its potential impact on early diagnosis.
Conclusion: The use of E-SN software in primary care services in NEL varied among participants. While some found it to be beneficial, others were sceptical of its impact on clinical decision-making. Nonetheless, the software was found to be effective in managing referral processes and tracking patients' progress in other points of care.
Keywords: CANCER; Decision support, computerised; Electronic Health Records; Patient safety; Qualitative research.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: DC works in the Cancer Alliance where this evaluation took place. AC and SP-D worked in the NEL Commissioning Support Unit at the time this evaluation was undertaken. The results of the evaluation had a direct impact on ongoing funding decisions in relation to the software.
Similar articles
-
Perceived benefits and challenges of using an electronic cancer prediction system for safety netting in primary care: An exploratory study of C the signs.Health Informatics J. 2024 Oct-Dec;30(4):14604582241279742. doi: 10.1177/14604582241279742. Health Informatics J. 2024. PMID: 39393051
-
Using chronic kidney disease trigger tools for safety and learning: a qualitative evaluation in East London primary care.Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Sep 26;69(687):e715-e723. doi: 10.3399/bjgp19X705497. Print 2019 Oct. Br J Gen Pract. 2019. PMID: 31455641 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic safety-netting tool features considered important by UK general practice staff: an interview and Delphi consensus study.BJGP Open. 2023 Sep 19;7(3):BJGPO.2022.0163. doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2022.0163. Print 2023 Sep. BJGP Open. 2023. PMID: 37277171 Free PMC article.
-
Youth violence intervention programme for vulnerable young people attending emergency departments in London: a rapid evaluation.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(10):1-122. doi: 10.3310/JWKT0492. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023. PMID: 37470144
-
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 33599282 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
How is diagnostic uncertainty communicated and managed in real world primary care settings?BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 12;25(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02526-x. BMC Prim Care. 2024. PMID: 39135159 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Risk Prediction Models for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 Aug 1;34(8):1240-1251. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1714. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025. PMID: 40402037 Free PMC article.
-
Pancreatic Cancer Risk Assessment Tools in Primary Care: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025 Jun 5;56(1):128. doi: 10.1007/s12029-025-01229-5. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40471466 Free PMC article.
-
The implementation challenge of computerised clinical decision support systems for the detection of disease in primary care: systematic review and recommendations.Implement Sci. 2025 Jul 17;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01445-4. Implement Sci. 2025. PMID: 40671071 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Friedemann Smith C, Lunn H, Wong G, et al. . “Optimising GPs’ communication of advice to facilitate patients' self-care and prompt follow-up when the diagnosis is uncertain: a realist review of “safety-netting” in primary care”. BMJ Qual Saf 2022;31:541–54. 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014529 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- 2020 surveillance of suspected cancer: recognition and referral (NICE guideline NG12). London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2020. - PubMed
-
- NHS England . Achieving world-class cancer outcomes: a strategy for England 2015-2020; 2015.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical