Using an electronic safety netting tool designed to improve safety with respect to cancer referral in primary care: a qualitative service evaluation using rapid appraisal methods
- PMID: 37491106
- PMCID: PMC10373707
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002354
Using an electronic safety netting tool designed to improve safety with respect to cancer referral in primary care: a qualitative service evaluation using rapid appraisal methods
Abstract
Background: This evaluation assesses the impact of an electronic safety netting software (E-SN) package, C the Signs, in primary care services across five boroughs in North East London (NEL).
Aim: This study evaluates the use of E-SN software in primary care, examining its benefits and barriers, safety implications, and overall impact on individual and practice usage.
Design and setting: The study is based on semi-structured interviews with 21 clinical and non-clinical members of staff from all primary care services using the software in NEL.
Method: Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather data on individual use of the software, safety implications and practice use of features such as the monitoring dashboard. Data were analysed using a rapid qualitative methodology.
Results: Two approaches to E-SN software adoption were reported: whole practice adoption and self-directed use. Practices benefitted from shared responsibility for safety netting and using software to track patients' progress in secondary care. Adoption was affected by information technology and administrative resources. Decision-support tools were used infrequently due to a lack of appreciation for their benefits. Selective adoption of different E-SN functions restricted its potential impact on early diagnosis.
Conclusion: The use of E-SN software in primary care services in NEL varied among participants. While some found it to be beneficial, others were sceptical of its impact on clinical decision-making. Nonetheless, the software was found to be effective in managing referral processes and tracking patients' progress in other points of care.
Keywords: CANCER; Decision support, computerised; Electronic Health Records; Patient safety; Qualitative research.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: DC works in the Cancer Alliance where this evaluation took place. AC and SP-D worked in the NEL Commissioning Support Unit at the time this evaluation was undertaken. The results of the evaluation had a direct impact on ongoing funding decisions in relation to the software.
References
-
- Friedemann Smith C, Lunn H, Wong G, et al. “Optimising GPs’ communication of advice to facilitate patients' self-care and prompt follow-up when the diagnosis is uncertain: a realist review of “safety-netting” in primary care”. BMJ Qual Saf 2022;31:541–54. 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014529 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- 2020 surveillance of suspected cancer: recognition and referral (NICE guideline NG12). London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2020. - PubMed
-
- NHS England . Achieving world-class cancer outcomes: a strategy for England 2015-2020; 2015.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical