Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;40(9):666-670.
doi: 10.1136/emermed-2022-213019. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

Refreshing the emergency medicine research priorities

Collaborators, Affiliations

Refreshing the emergency medicine research priorities

Laura Cottey et al. Emerg Med J. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The priorities for UK emergency medicine research were defined in 2017 by a priority setting partnership coordinated by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine in collaboration with the James Lind Alliance (JLA). Much has changed in the last 5 years, not least a global infectious disease pandemic and a significant worsening of the crisis in the urgent and emergency care system. Our aim was to review and refresh the emergency medicine research priorities.

Methods: A steering group including patients, carers and healthcare professionals was established to agree to the methodology of the refresh. An independent adviser from the JLA chaired the steering group. The scope was adult patients in the ED. New questions were invited via an open call using multiple communications methods ensuring that patients, carers and healthcare professionals had the opportunity to contribute. Questions underwent minisystematic (BestBETs) review to determine if the question had been answered, and the original 2017 priorities were reviewed. Any questions that remained unanswered were included in an interim prioritisation survey, which was distributed to patients, carers and healthcare professionals. Rankings from this survey were reviewed by the steering group and a shortlist of questions put forward to the final workshop, which was held to discuss and rank the research questions in order of priority.

Results: 77 new questions were submitted, of which 58 underwent mini-systematic review. After this process, 49 questions (of which 32 were new, 11 were related to original priorities and 6 unanswered original priorities were carried forward) were reviewed by the steering group and included in an interim prioritisation survey. The interim prioritisation survey attracted 276 individual responses. 26 questions were shortlisted for discussion at the final prioritisation workshop, where the top 10 research priorities were agreed.

Conclusion: We have redefined the priorities for emergency medicine research in the UK using robust and established methodology, which will inform the agenda for the coming years.

Keywords: acute medicine; major trauma management; mental health; research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: TG was paid by the Royal College of Emergency Medicine for her role as chair of the steering group.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
JLA PSP, James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

References

    1. Smith J, Keating L, Flowerdew L, et al. . An emergency medicine research priority setting partnership to establish the top 10 research priorities in emergency medicine. Emerg Med J 2017;34:454–6. 10.1136/emermed-2017-206702 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. NIHR . NIHR James LIND alliance priority setting partnerships rolling call. 2022. Available: https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/nihr-james-lind-alliance-priority-setti...
    1. Corfield A. Early vasopressors in sepsis (EVIS). 2021. Available: https://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/NIHR132594#/summary-of-research
    1. Lasserson D. Stopping anticoagulation for isolated or incidental sub-segmental pulmonary embolism (STOPAPE) Natl. Inst. Health Care Res. Funding awards. 2019. Available: https://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/NIHR128073#/ - PubMed
    1. Goodacre S. Accuracy, impact and cost-effectiveness of Prehospital clinical early warning scores for adults with suspected sepsis. Natl. Inst. Health Care Res. Funding awards. 2019. Available: https://fundingawards.nihr.ac.uk/award/17/136/10#/