Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 25;13(1):12040.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38886-0.

Plasma microRNA ratios associated with breast cancer detection in a nested case-control study from a mammography screening cohort

Affiliations

Plasma microRNA ratios associated with breast cancer detection in a nested case-control study from a mammography screening cohort

Giovanna Chiorino et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Mammographic breast cancer screening is effective in reducing breast cancer mortality. Nevertheless, several limitations are known. Therefore, developing an alternative or complementary non-invasive tool capable of increasing the accuracy of the screening process is highly desirable. The objective of this study was to identify circulating microRNA (miRs) ratios associated with BC in women attending mammography screening. A nested case-control study was conducted within the ANDROMEDA cohort (women of age 46-67 attending BC screening). Pre-diagnostic plasma samples, information on life-styles and common BC risk factors were collected. Small-RNA sequencing was carried out on plasma samples from 65 cases and 66 controls. miR ratios associated with BC were selected by two-sample Wilcoxon test and lasso logistic regression. Subsequent assessment by RT-qPCR of the miRs contained in the selected miR ratios was carried out as a platform validation. To identify the most promising biomarkers, penalised logistic regression was further applied to candidate miR ratios alone, or in combination with non-molecular factors. Small-RNA sequencing yielded 20 candidate miR ratios associated with BC, which were further assessed by RT-qPCR. In the resulting model, penalised logistic regression selected seven miR ratios (miR-199a-3p_let-7a-5p, miR-26b-5p_miR-142-5p, let-7b-5p_miR-19b-3p, miR-101-3p_miR-19b-3p, miR-93-5p_miR-19b-3p, let-7a-5p_miR-22-3p and miR-21-5p_miR-23a-3p), together with body mass index (BMI), menopausal status (MS), the interaction term BMI * MS, life-style score and breast density. The ROC AUC of the model was 0.79 with a sensitivity and specificity of 71.9% and 76.6%, respectively. We identified biomarkers potentially useful for BC screening measured through a widespread and low-cost technique. This is the first study reporting circulating miRs for BC detection in a screening setting. Validation in a wider sample is warranted.Trial registration: The Andromeda prospective cohort study protocol was retrospectively registered on 27-11-2015 (NCT02618538).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow-chart of the study. * The let-7f-5p-2_miR-103a-3p-2 ratio was removed as miR-103a-3p-2 and miR-103a-3p-1, found in the let-7f-5p-1_miR-103a-3p-1 ratio, had almost identical counts and their ratio partners had identical mature miR sequences. ‡ One sample had to be excluded in the RT-qPCR step due to insufficient plasma volume.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curve of the multivariable model on 7 miR ratios and other non-molecular variables.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Hacker A, Sedlacek S. Advantages and disadvantages of mammography screening. Breast Care. 2011;6:2–2. doi: 10.1159/000329005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Myers ER, Moorman P, Gierisch JM, Havrilesky LJ, Grimm LJ, Ghate S, et al. Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: A systematic review. JAMA. 2015;314:1615. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13183. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schünemann HJ, Lerda D, Quinn C, Follmann M, Alonso-Coello P, Rossi PG, et al. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis: A synopsis of the European breast guidelines. Ann. Intern. Med. 2020;172:46. doi: 10.7326/M19-2125. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allweis TM, Hermann N, Berenstein-Molho R, Guindy M. Personalized screening for breast cancer: Rationale, present practices, and future directions. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2021;28:4306–4317. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-09426-1. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data