External fixation versus intramedullary nailing for the management of open tibial fracture: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 37491610
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-05879-7
External fixation versus intramedullary nailing for the management of open tibial fracture: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Aim: Tibial shaft fractures are the most common type of long-bone fractures. External fixation (EF) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are widely used surgical techniques for the definitive fixation of open tibial shaft fractures. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare EF to IMN for the definitive fixation of open tibial fractures.
Methods: Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched for eligible studies. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared EF to IMN for skeletally mature adults with open tibial fracture (Gustilo I, II, and III). We evaluated the following outcomes: superficial infection, pin-track infection, deep infection, malunion, nonunion, delayed union, and implant/hardware failure. The risk ratio (RR) was used to represent the desired outcomes. The statistical analysis was performed using the random-effects model.
Results: A total of 12 RCTs that enrolled 1090 participants were deemed eligible for the analysis. EF showed a significantly higher rate of superficial infection, pin track infection, and malunion compared to IMN (RR = 2.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34 to 3.95; RR = 13.52, 95% CI: 6.16 to 29.66; RR = 2.29, 95% CI 1.41 to 3.73, respectively). No substantial difference was found between EF and IMN in terms of deep infection, nonunion, delayed union, or implant/hardware failure (RR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.98; RR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.10; RR = 1.50, 95% CI 0.98 to 3.33; RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.36 to 2.60, respectively).
Discussion: The findings of our meta-analysis are consistent with the previous systematic reviews excepts for the implant/hardware failure which was found to be significant in favour of IMN by one of the previous reviews.
Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms that IMN is better than EF with respect to clinical outcomes and complication rate for the definitive fixation of open tibial fracture.
Keywords: External fixation; Internal fixation; Intramedullary nail; Tibial fracture.
© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.
Similar articles
-
Comparing external fixators and intramedullary nailing for treating open tibia fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jan 5;18(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03490-x. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023. PMID: 36604668 Free PMC article.
-
Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing External Fixation to Intramedullary Nailing in the Treatment of Open Tibial Fractures.Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 14;59(7):1301. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071301. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. PMID: 37512111 Free PMC article.
-
Treatment of type II, IIIA, and IIIB open fractures of the tibial shaft: a prospective comparison of unreamed interlocking intramedullary nails and half-pin external fixators.J Orthop Trauma. 1998 Jan;12(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199801000-00001. J Orthop Trauma. 1998. PMID: 9447512 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of intramedullary nailing and plate fixation in distal tibial fractures with metaphyseal damage: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Jan 25;14(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-1037-1. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 30683118 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Individual risk factors for deep infection and compromised fracture healing after intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: a single centre experience of 480 patients.Injury. 2015 Apr;46(4):740-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.12.018. Epub 2014 Dec 27. Injury. 2015. PMID: 25583638
Cited by
-
Comparative outcome study of the management of open tibia shaft fractures using Ilizarov frame fixator and linear rail system at University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.Int Orthop. 2025 Aug;49(8):1973-1980. doi: 10.1007/s00264-025-06569-2. Epub 2025 Jun 4. Int Orthop. 2025. PMID: 40464907
-
Infection rates and risk factors with magnetic intramedullary lengthening nails.J Orthop. 2024 Apr 18;55:124-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.04.017. eCollection 2024 Sep. J Orthop. 2024. PMID: 38706586
-
The loneliness of the local orthopaedic surgeon in disaster zones.Int Orthop. 2024 Feb;48(2):323-330. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06089-5. Int Orthop. 2024. PMID: 38206394 No abstract available.
-
Measurement of the dynamic axial load-share ratio in vivo could indicate sufficient callus healing in external fixators.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Feb 12;26(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08353-0. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 39940030 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Analysis of Complication Rates in Tibial Shaft Fractures: Intramedullary Nail vs. Ilizarov External Fixation Method.J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 31;13(7):2034. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072034. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38610799 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Court-Brown CM, Bugler KE, Clement ND, Duckworth AD, McQueen MM (2012) The epidemiology of open fractures in adults. A 15-year review. Injury 43(6):891–897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.12.007 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Court-Brown CM, Rimmer S, Prakash U, McQueen MM (1998) The epidemiology of open long bone fractures. Injury 29(7):529–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(98)00125-9 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Papakostidis C, Kanakaris NK, Pretel J, Faour O, Morell DJ, Giannoudis PV (2011) Prevalence of complications of open tibial shaft fractures stratified as per the Gustilo-Anderson classification. Injury 42(12):1408–1415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.10.015 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lua JYC, Tan VH, Sivasubramanian H, Kwek EBK (2017) Complications of open tibial fracture management: risk factors and treatment. Malaysian Orthopaedic J 11(1):18. https://doi.org/10.5704/2FMOJ.1703.006 - DOI
-
- Small JO, Mollan RA (1992) Management of the soft tissues in open tibial fractures. Br J Plast Surg 45(8):571–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(92)90022-P - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical