Towards reliable hepatocytic anatomy segmentation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using U-Net with Auto-Encoder
- PMID: 37491657
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10306-4
Towards reliable hepatocytic anatomy segmentation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy using U-Net with Auto-Encoder
Abstract
Background: Most bile duct (BDI) injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) occur due to visual misperception leading to the misinterpretation of anatomy. Deep learning (DL) models for surgical video analysis could, therefore, support visual tasks such as identifying critical view of safety (CVS). This study aims to develop a prediction model of CVS during LC. This aim is accomplished using a deep neural network integrated with a segmentation model that is capable of highlighting hepatocytic anatomy.
Methods: Still images from LC videos were annotated with four hepatocystic landmarks of anatomy segmentation. A deep autoencoder neural network with U-Net to investigate accurate medical image segmentation was trained and tested using fivefold cross-validation. Accuracy, Loss, Intersection over Union (IoU), Precision, Recall, and Hausdorff Distance were computed to evaluate the model performance versus the annotated ground truth.
Results: A total of 1550 images from 200 LC videos were annotated. Mean IoU for segmentation was 74.65%. The proposed approach performed well for automatic hepatocytic landmarks identification with 92% accuracy and 93.9% precision and can segment challenging cases.
Conclusion: DL, can potentially provide an intraoperative model for surgical video analysis and can be trained to guide surgeons toward reliable hepatocytic anatomy segmentation and produce selective video documentation of this safety step of LC.
Keywords: Anatomy segmentation; Auto-Encoder; Challenging cases; Critical view of safety; Deep learning; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Surgical safety; U-Net.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Detection of anatomic landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the use of artificial intelligence-a systematic review of the literature.Updates Surg. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02227-9. Online ahead of print. Updates Surg. 2025. PMID: 40350500 Review.
-
Artificial Intelligence for Surgical Safety: Automatic Assessment of the Critical View of Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Deep Learning.Ann Surg. 2022 May 1;275(5):955-961. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004351. Epub 2020 Nov 16. Ann Surg. 2022. PMID: 33201104
-
Endoscapes, a critical view of safety and surgical scene segmentation dataset for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Sci Data. 2025 Feb 25;12(1):331. doi: 10.1038/s41597-025-04642-4. Sci Data. 2025. PMID: 40000637 Free PMC article.
-
Development of an artificial intelligence system for real-time intraoperative assessment of the Critical View of Safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8755-8763. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10328-y. Epub 2023 Aug 11. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37567981
-
Safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review of bile duct injury prevention.Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:164-172. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Nov 12. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 30439536
Cited by
-
Use of artificial intelligence in the analysis of digital videos of invasive surgical procedures: scoping review.BJS Open. 2025 Jul 1;9(4):zraf073. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraf073. BJS Open. 2025. PMID: 40673467 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of anatomic landmarks during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with the use of artificial intelligence-a systematic review of the literature.Updates Surg. 2025 May 12. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02227-9. Online ahead of print. Updates Surg. 2025. PMID: 40350500 Review.
-
Systematic review on the use of artificial intelligence to identify anatomical structures during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a tool towards the future.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Mar 18;410(1):101. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03651-6. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025. PMID: 40100424 Free PMC article.
-
Vision techniques for anatomical structures in laparoscopic surgery: a comprehensive review.Front Surg. 2025 Apr 14;12:1557153. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1557153. eCollection 2025. Front Surg. 2025. PMID: 40297644 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Shaffer EA (2005) Epidemiology and risk factors for gallstone disease: has the paradigm changed in the 21st century? Curr Gastroenterol Rep 7(2):132–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-005-0051-8 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Buddingh KT, Weersma RK, Savenije RA, Van Dam GM, Nieuwenhuijs VB (2011) Lower rate of major bile duct injury and increased intraoperative management of common bile duct stones after implementation of routine intraoperative cholangiography. J Am Coll Surg 213(2):267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.03.004 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Törnqvist B, Strömberg C, Persson G, Nilsson M (2012) Effect of intended intraoperative cholangiography and early detection of bile duct injury on survival after cholecystectomy: population based cohort study. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 345:e6457. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6457 - DOI
-
- Berci G, Hunter J, Morgenstern L, Arregui M, Mrunt M, Carroll B, Edye M, Fermelia D, Ferzli G, Greene F, Petelin J, Phillips E, Ponsky J, Sax H, Schwaitzberg S, Soper N, Swanstrom L, Rraverso W (2013) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: first, do no harm; second, take care of bile duct stones. Surg Endosc 27(4):1051–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2767-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ (1995) An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 180(1):101–125 - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources