Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Oct;25(10):1849-1855.
doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2981. Epub 2023 Aug 10.

Palliative care in heart failure guidelines: A comparison of the 2021 ESC and the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines on heart failure

Affiliations
Free article
Review

Palliative care in heart failure guidelines: A comparison of the 2021 ESC and the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guidelines on heart failure

Moritz Blum et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2023 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

The role of palliative care for patients with heart failure (HF) is discussed in both most recent HF guidelines, the 2021 ESC guideline and the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline. This review compares the definitions, concepts and specific recommendations regarding palliative care for patients with HF in these two guidelines. Both HF guidelines define palliative care as a multidisciplinary approach aimed at alleviating physical, psychological and spiritual distress of patients and caregivers. Both agree emphatically on the importance of palliative care across all stages of HF with integration early in the illness trajectory. Also, the guidelines concur that palliative care should include symptom management, communication about prognosis and life-sustaining therapies, as well as advance care planning. Despite this consensus, only the AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline gives official recommendations on the provision of palliative care. Moreover, the AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline advocates for a needs-based approach to palliative care allocation while the ESC guideline ties palliative care closely to advanced HF and end-of-life care. The ESC guideline highlights the need for regular symptom assessment and provides detailed guidance on symptom management. The AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline elaborates further on shared decision-making, caregiver and bereavement support, as well as hospice care, and distinguishes between primary palliative care (provided by all clinicians) and secondary (specialty-level) palliative care. Although there is strong agreement on the importance and components of palliative care for patients with HF, there are nuanced differences between the two HF guidelines. Most notably, only the AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline issues recommendations for the provision of palliative care.

Keywords: Guideline comparison; Heart failure; Palliative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, et al.; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2023 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2023;147:e93-e621. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123
    1. Blinderman CD, Homel P, Billings JA, Portenoy RK, Tennstedt SL. Symptom distress and quality of life in patients with advanced congestive heart failure. J Pain Symptom Manage 2008;35:594-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.06.007
    1. Kavalieratos D, Kamal AH, Abernethy AP, Biddle AK, Carey TS, Dev S, et al. Comparing unmet needs between community-based palliative care patients with heart failure and patients with cancer. J Palliat Med 2014;17:475-481. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2013.0526
    1. World Health Organization. Palliative care. 5 August 2020 https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care. Accessed 18 February 2022
    1. Bakitas M, MacMartin M, Trzepkowski K, Robert A, Jackson L, Brown JR, et al. Palliative care consultations for heart failure patients: How many, when, and why? J Card Fail 2013;19:193-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2013.01.011