Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan;116(1):e2225.
doi: 10.1002/bdr2.2225. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

Scientific impact of the National Birth Defects Prevention Network multistate collaborative publications

Jacqueline T Bascom  1 , Sara B Stephens  1 , Philip J Lupo  2 , Mark A Canfield  3 , Russell S Kirby  4 , Eirini Nestoridi  5 , Jason L Salemi  4 , Cara T Mai  6 , Wendy N Nembhard  7 , Nina E Forestieri  8 , Paul A Romitti  9 , Amanda M St Louis  10 , A J Agopian  1
Affiliations
Review

Scientific impact of the National Birth Defects Prevention Network multistate collaborative publications

Jacqueline T Bascom et al. Birth Defects Res. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Given the lack of a national, population-based birth defects surveillance program in the United States, the National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) has facilitated important studies on surveillance, research, and prevention of major birth defects. We sought to summarize NBDPN peer-reviewed publications and their impact.

Methods: We obtained and reviewed a curated list of 49 NBDPN multistate collaborative publications during 2000-2022, as of December 31, 2022. Each publication was reviewed and classified by type (e.g., risk factor association analysis). Key characteristics of study populations and analytic approaches used, along with publication impact (e.g., number of citations), were tabulated.

Results: NBDPN publications focused on prevalence estimates (N = 17), surveillance methods (N = 11), risk factor associations (N = 10), mortality and other outcomes among affected individuals (N = 6), and descriptive epidemiology of various birth defects (N = 5). The most cited publications were those that reported on prevalence estimates for a spectrum of defects and those that assessed changes in neural tube defects (NTD) prevalence following mandatory folic acid fortification in the United States.

Conclusions: Results from multistate NBDPN publications have provided critical information not available through other sources, including US prevalence estimates of major birth defects, folic acid fortification and NTD prevention, and improved understanding of defect trends and surveillance efforts. Until a national birth defects surveillance program is established in the United States, NBDPN collaborative publications remain an important resource for investigating birth defects and informing decisions related to health services planning of secondary disabilities prevention and care.

Keywords: birth defects; birth defects network; chromosomal abnormalities; congenital anomalies; data utilization; non-syndromic; prevalence ratios; registries; surveillance programs.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Almli LM, Ely DM, Ailes EC, Abouk R, Grosse SD, Isenburg JL, Waldron DB, & Reefhuis J (2020). Infant mortality attributable to birth defects—United States, 2003–2017. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 69(2), 25–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderka M, Mai CT, Judson EM, Langlois PH, Lupo PJ, Hauser K, Salemi JL, Correia J, Canfield MA, Kirby RS, & National Birth Defects Prevention Network. (2018). Status of population-based birth defects surveillance programs before and after the Zika public health response in the United States. Birth Defects Research, 110(19), 1388–1394. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderka M, Mai CT, Romitti PA, Copeland G, Isenburg J, Feldkamp ML, Krikov S, Rickard R, Olney RS, Canfield MA, Stanton C, Mosley B, & Kirby RS (2015). Development and implementation of the first national data quality standards for population-based birth defects surveillance programs in the United States. BMC Public Health, 15, 925. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atta CA, Fiest KM, Frolkis AD, Jette N, Pringsheim T, St Germaine-Smith C, Rajapakse T, Kaplan GG, & Metcalfe A (2016). Global birth prevalence of Spina bifida by folic acid fortification status: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 106(1), e24–e34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banu T, Rahman HZ, Ozgediz D, & Lakhoo K (2022). Surgery, a multi-dimensional entry point for World Birth Defects Day—March 3. Pediatric Surgery International, 38(4), 653–654. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources