Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023;12(3):175-181.
doi: 10.14283/jfa.2023.11.

Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Values of a Postal Mail Self-Screening Tool for Frailty in French Older Adults

J Shourick  1 , P Lucas, N Tavassoli, M Rego-Lopes, M L Seux, O Hanon, S Andrieu, B Vellas, F Forette
Affiliations
Observational Study

Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Values of a Postal Mail Self-Screening Tool for Frailty in French Older Adults

J Shourick et al. J Frailty Aging. 2023.

Abstract

Background: Frailty has emerged as one of the major risk factors of loss of autonomy and it can be reverted through early and appropriate interventions. A wide range of available frailty screening tools are administered, mainly in clinical settings. However, few frailty instruments are self-administered.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of a modified self-administered questionnaire derived from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF) index against the Fried frailty phenotype in identifying frailty.

Design: Observational, multicenter, diagnostic test accuracy study.

Participants: Participants aged 70 and over, living at home or in community-dwelling (n=5134) in two centers in France were contacted.

Measurements: Participants were mailed self-administered questionnaires derived from the SOF index. Responders who accepted the home evaluation were assessed by trained nurses, blinded to results of the questionnaire, using the Fried frailty phenotype as the reference method.

Results: The questionnaire was sent to 5134 participants, of which 1878 (36.6%) met inclusion criteria and returned the questionnaire. Fried frailty assessments were obtained in 691 (35.4%) participants. A total of 639 subjects had a complete evaluation on both the self-administered questionnaire and the Fried phenotype. Mean age was 78.9 (standard deviation [SD]: 5.95) years and 359 (56.2%) participants were women. According to the questionnaire, 159 (24.9%) subjects were considered frail, 172 (26.9%) pre-frail, and 308 (48.2) robust. With the home evaluation, Fried frailty phenotype results were respectively, 114 (17.8%), 295 (46.2%) and 230 (36%). The self-administered questionnaire presented a sensitivity of 66.6% (95% CI: 57.2-75.2) and a specificity of 84.2% (95% CI: 80.8-87.2).

Conclusions: A self-administered questionnaire can be used in elders and represents an opportunity for empowering them in the management of their health in the context of frailty.

Keywords: Frailty; diagnostic accuracy; self-assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of subjects selection and frailty assessment
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2001;56(3):M146–57. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Puts MTE, Toubasi S, Andrew MK, Ashe MC, Ploeg J, Atkinson E, et al. Interventions to prevent or reduce the level of frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review of the literature and international policies. Age Ageing. 2017 Jan 6;ageing;afw247v1. Doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw247 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ofori-Asenso R, Chin KL, Mazidi M, et al. Global Incidence of Frailty and Prefrailty Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):e198398. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8398. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xue Q-L. The Frailty Syndrome: Definition and Natural History. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 2011;27(1):1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2010.08.009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. The Lancet. 2013;381(9868):752–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources