Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 26:6:e41032.
doi: 10.2196/41032.

Underestimated Factors Regarding the Use of Technology in Daily Practice of Long-Term Care: Qualitative Study Among Health Care Professionals

Affiliations

Underestimated Factors Regarding the Use of Technology in Daily Practice of Long-Term Care: Qualitative Study Among Health Care Professionals

Sjors W M Groeneveld et al. JMIR Nurs. .

Abstract

Background: Increasing life expectancy is resulting in a growing demand for long-term care; however, there is a shortage of qualified health care professionals (HCPs) to deliver it. If used optimally, technology can provide a solution to this challenge. HCPs play an important role in the use of technology in long-term care. However, technology influences several core aspects of the work that HCPs do, and it is therefore important to have a good understanding of their viewpoint regarding the use of technology in daily practice of long-term care.

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the factors that HCPs consider as relevant for using technology in daily practice of long-term care.

Methods: In this qualitative study, 11 focus groups were organized with 73 HCPs. The focus group discussions were guided by an innovative game, which was specifically developed for this study. The content of the game was categorized into 4 categories: health care technology and me; health care technology, the patient, and me; health care technology, the organization, and me; and facilitating conditions. The perspectives of HCPs about working with technology were discussed based on this game. The focus groups were recorded and transcribed, followed by an inductive thematic analysis using ATLAS.ti 9x (ATLAS.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH).

Results: Overall, 2 main domain summaries were developed from the data: technology should improve the quality of care and acceptance and use of technology in care. The first factor indicates the need for tailored and personalized care and balance between human contact and technology. The second factor addresses several aspects regarding working with technology such as trusting technology, learning to work with technology, and collaboration with colleagues.

Conclusions: HCPs are motivated to use technology in daily practice of long-term care when it adds value to the quality of care and there is sufficient trust, expertise, and collaboration with colleagues. Their perspectives need to be considered as they play a crucial part in the successful use of technology, transcending their role as an actor in implementation. On the basis of the findings from this study, we recommend focusing on developing technology for situations where both efficiency and quality of care can be improved; redefining the roles of HCPs and the impact of technology hereon; involving HCPs in the design process of technology to enable them to link it to their daily practice; and creating ambassadors in care teams who are enthusiastic about working with technology and can support and train their colleagues.

Keywords: acceptance; adoption; competencies; digital health; eHealth; health care professionals; health technology; implementation; nurse; nurse assistant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Steps taken in creating the game.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of the three rounds in the game.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Overview of domain summaries, themes, and layers.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Department of Economic and Social Affairs . World Population Prospects 2019. Geneva: United Nations; 2019.
    1. Prince MJ, Wu F, Guo Y, Gutierrez Robledo LM, O'Donnell M, Sullivan R, Yusuf S. The burden of disease in older people and implications for health policy and practice. Lancet. 2015 Feb 07;385(9967):549–62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61347-7.S0140-6736(14)61347-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chan ZC, Tam WS, Lung MK, Wong WY, Chau CW. A systematic literature review of nurse shortage and the intention to leave. J Nurs Manag. 2013 May;21(4):605–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01437.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kamerbrief over nieuw arbeidsmarktprognose zorg en welzijn. De Rijksoverheid. Voor Nederland. 2023. Mar 22, [2023-04-28]. https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/kamerstukken/2023/03/22/kamerbri... .
    1. Kivimäki T, Stolt M, Charalambous A, Suhonen R. Safety of older people at home: an integrative literature review. Int J Older People Nurs. 2020 Mar;15(1):e12285. doi: 10.1111/opn.12285. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2021042820880 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources