Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun;45(6):297-302.
doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1770917. Epub 2023 Jul 21.

Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders: Current Recommendations from the Perspective of Antenatal Imaging

Affiliations

Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorders: Current Recommendations from the Perspective of Antenatal Imaging

Conrado Milani Coutinho et al. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Jun.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The broader spectrum of potential complications in pregnancies with prior uterine scars. On first and second lines, the respective ultrasound and surgical appearances of the following potential pregnancy abnormalities: A - myometrial dehiscence without overlying placenta; B - myometrial dehiscence with partial placental intrusion; C - myometrial dehiscence with complete placental intrusion; D - cesarean scar pregnancy; E - placenta accreta spectrum. Apart from case A, placenta previa is present on all other cases. On the lower line, potential perinatal adverse outcomes: major uterine bleeding, uterine rupture, unintentional bladder lesion, and neonatal complications of prematurity.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Intraoperative topographical classification for placenta accreta spectrum and management protocol. MSTH, Modified subtotal hysterectomy; OSCS, One-step conservative surgery; PAS, Placenta accreta spectrum. Source: Adapted from Nieto-Calvache AJ, Aguilera LR. Simulation, a fundamental component of training to treat placenta accreta spectrum. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2022;44(12):1159-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1760216.

References

    1. Sung S, Mahdy H.Cesarean section. In: StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 12]. Available from:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546707/ - PubMed
    1. Betran A P, Ye J, Moller A B, Souza J P, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6(06):e005671. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deneux-Tharaux C. Utérus cicatriciel : aspects épidémiologiques. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2012;41(08):697–707. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2012.09.022. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ananth C V, Smulian J C, Vintzileos A M. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(05):1071–1078. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70017-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zwart J J, Richters J M, Öry F, de Vries J I, Bloemenkamp K W, van Roosmalen J.Uterine rupture in The Netherlands: a nationwide population-based cohort study BJOG 2009116081069–1078., discussion 1078–108010.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02136.x - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources