Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2023 Jul 11:5:1248720.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1248720. eCollection 2023.

Editorial: Women in anti-doping sciences & integrity in sport: 2021/22

Andrea Petróczi  1   2 , Kim Nolte  3 , Angela Jo-Anne Schneider  4
Affiliations
Editorial

Editorial: Women in anti-doping sciences & integrity in sport: 2021/22

Andrea Petróczi et al. Front Sports Act Living. .
No abstract available

Keywords: anti-doping; gender difference; impact; integrity; research output.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Valuable characteristics of women's research and research outputs.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Authorship network map. Colour denotes gender, size of the nodes corresponds to the authors’ H-indices based on Web of Science in 2022 December). Authorship positions are displayed in the interactive version of this network map: https://public.flourish.studio/visualisation/14246812/. Move the cursor above the nodes to see the authorship positions on the interactive map.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Bianchini S, Llerena P, Öcalan-Özel S, Özel E. Gender diversity of research consortia contributes to funding decisions in a multi-stage grant peer-review process. Humanit Soc Sci Commun . (2022) 9:195. 10.1057/s41599-022-01204-6 - DOI
    1. Kalpazidou Schmidt E, Cacace M. Setting up a dynamic framework to activate gender equality structural transformation in research organizations. Sci Public Pol. (2019) 46(3):321–38. 10.1093/scipol/scy059 - DOI
    1. Morgan R, Hawkins K, Lundine J. The foundation and consequences of gender bias in grant peer review processes. Can Med Assoc J. (2018) 190(16):E487–8. 10.1503/cmaj.180188 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wijnen MN, Massen JJ, Kret ME. Gender bias in the allocation of student grants. Scientometrics. (2021) 126(7):5477–88. 10.1007/s11192-021-03985-0 - DOI
    1. Ovseiko PV, Greenhalgh T, Adam P, Grant J, Hinrichs-Krapels S, Graham KE, et al. A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment. Health Res Policy Sys. (2016) 14:50. 10.1186/s12961-016-0126-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources