Effect and timing of operative treatment for teratoma associated N-Methyl-d-Aspartate receptor-antibody encephalitis: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Abstract

Resection of an underlying ovarian teratoma in patients with N-Methyl-d-Aspartate receptor (NMDAR)-antibody encephalitis is supported by pathophysiological studies demonstrating the production of NMDAR antibodies within the teratoma. This systematic review assesses the clinical effect of teratoma resection and compares early versus late resection. Literature search was performed on the first of October 2022 (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science). Original studies including more than three patients with NDMAR encephalitis and associated ovarian teratoma were included and evaluated with the Study Quality Assessment Tool for risk of bias. Fourteen studies referring to 1499 patients were included and analyzed in four syntheses using the fixed Mantel-Haenszel method. The rate of relapse in patients with ovarian teratoma resection was lower than in patients without resection (risk ratio for relapse 0.30, 95% CI 0.17-0.51), however the certainty level of evidence is very low. Despite some evidence pointing to a beneficial effect of early teratoma resection in patients with NMDAR-antibody encephalitis, systematically accessible data are insufficient to provide recommendations for or against resection, as well as for timing of surgery. The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, or publication of this article. For the systematic review no clinical-trial database registration had been done.

Keywords: Anti-N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis; Meta-analysis; Modified Rankin scale; Operative; Ovarian teratoma; Relapse; Surgical procedures; Systematic review.