Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis
- PMID: 37500963
- DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07063-2
Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis
Abstract
Purpose: The status of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) is an important factor in determining the stage of breast cancer (BC) and the surgical procedure, and also a biomarker of the BC prognosis. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for SLN metastasis.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted for relevant articles published in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, OVID databases, and Cochrane Library from inception to March 2023. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio (PLR; NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curve to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of CEUS in SLN metastasis. Subgroup analysis was also performed to investigate potential sources of heterogeneity.
Results: A total of 12 studies with 1525 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of CEUS in the diagnosis of SLN metastasis were 0.91 (95% CI: 0.84-0.95) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.78-0.92). The PLR, NLR, and DOR were 6.51 (95% CI: 4.09-10.36), 0.11 (95% CI: 0.07-0.18), and 59.43 (95% CI: 33.27-106.17), respectively, and the area under the SROC curve was determined to be 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92-0.96), all showing excellent diagnostic value. In the subgroup analysis, percutaneous CEUS was more sensitive than intravenous CEUS in the diagnosis of SLN metastases (0.92 versus 0.82, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: CEUS, especially percutaneous CEUS, is a reliable imaging technique for diagnosing SLN metastasis and providing important information in the stage management of breast cancer.
Keywords: Axillary lymph node; Breast cancer; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Meta-analysis; Sentinel lymph node.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Yang H, Pawitan Y, He W, Eriksson L, Holowko N, Hall P, Czene K (2019) Disease trajectories and mortality among women diagnosed with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 21:95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1181-5 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Dhankhar R, Vyas SP, Jain AK, Arora S, Rath G, Goyal AK (2010) Advances in novel drug delivery strategies for breast cancer therapy. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol 38:230–249. https://doi.org/10.3109/10731199.2010.494578 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Qiao J, Li J, Wang L, Guo X, Bian X, Lu Z (2021) Predictive risk factors for sentinel lymph node metastasis using preoperative contrast-enhanced ultrasound in early-stage breast cancer patients. Gland Surg 10:761–769. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-20-867 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Cserni G, Maguire A, Bianchi S, Ryska A, Kovács A (2022) Sentinel lymph node assessment in breast cancer-an update on current recommendations. Virchows Arch 480:95–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-021-03128-z - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lyman GH, Somerfield MR, Bosserman LD, Perkins CL, Weaver DL, Giuliano AE (2017) Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: american society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 35:561–564. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.71.0947 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
