Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Follow-up of the re-evaluation of indigo carmine (E 132) as a food additive

EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

Indigo carmine (E 312) was re-evaluated in 2014 by the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient sources added to Food (ANS). The ANS Panel confirmed the acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 5 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day for indigo carmine allocated by JECFA (1975). The ANS Panel indicated that the ADI was applicable to a material with a purity of 93% pure colouring and manufactured using processes resulting in comparable residuals as material used in the Borzelleca et al. studies (1985, 1986) and Borzelleca and Hogan (1985) which were the basis for deriving the ADI. The ANS Panel considered that any extension of the ADI to indigo carmine of lower purity and/or manufactured using a different process would require new data to address the adverse effects on the testes observed in the Dixit and Goyal (2013) study. Following a European Commission call for data to submit data to fill the data gaps, an IBO submitted technical and toxicological data. Considering the technical data, the EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Flavourings (FAF Panel) recommended some modifications of the existing EU specifications for E 132, mainly to lower the limits for toxic elements. Considering the toxicological data, an IBO has submitted a 56-day dietary study to address the adverse effects on testes using a material with 88% purity. The results of this study submitted did not confirm the severe adverse effects observed in the Dixit and Goyal study. Considering all the available information, the Panel confirmed the ADI of 5 mg/kg bw per day for indigo carmine (E 132) disodium salts, meeting the proposed revisions of the specifications (85% minimum for the colouring matter). The Panel concluded that there is no safety concern for the use of indigo carmine (E 132) disodium salts at the reported use levels and submitted analytical data.

Keywords: E 132; EINECS 212‐728‐8; FD&C Blue No. 2; Indigo Carmine; Indigotine; aniline; disodium 3,3‐dioxo‐2,2‐bi‐indolylidene‐5,5‐disulfonate; food additive.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural formula of disodium 3,3′‐dioxo‐2,2′‐bi‐indo‐lylidene‐5,5′‐disulfonate
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structural formula of (a) disodium salt of 2‐(1,3‐dihydro‐3‐oxo‐7‐sulfo‐2H‐indol‐2‐ylidene)‐2,3‐dihydro‐3‐oxo‐1H‐indole‐5‐sulfonic acid and (b) indigo sulfonic acid

References

    1. Borzelleca JF and Hogan GK, 1985. Chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study of FD&C Blue No. 2 in mice. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 23, 719–722. 10.1016/0278-6915(85)90264-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borzelleca JF, Hogan GK and Koestner A, 1985. Chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity study of FD&C Blue No. 2 in rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 23, 551–558. 10.1016/0278-6915(85)90178-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Borzelleca JF, Goldenthal EI and Wazeter FX, 1986. Multigeneration study of FD&C Blue No. 2 in rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 24, 159–163. 10.1016/0278-6915(86)90351-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crabtree HC, Hart D, Thomas MC, Witham BH, McKenzie IG and Smith CP, 1991. Carcinogenic ranking of aromatic amines and nitro compounds. Mutation Research, 264, 155–162. 10.1016/0165-7992(91)90071-b - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dixit A and Goyal RP, 2013. Evaluation of Reproductive toxicity caused by Indigo carmine on male swiss albino mice. Pharmacology Online, 1, 218–224. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287328182_Evaluation_of_Reprodu...

LinkOut - more resources