Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 12:14:1156665.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1156665. eCollection 2023.

Identification of T-DNA structure and insertion site in transgenic crops using targeted capture sequencing

Affiliations

Identification of T-DNA structure and insertion site in transgenic crops using targeted capture sequencing

Eric Maina Magembe et al. Front Plant Sci. .

Abstract

The commercialization of GE crops requires a rigorous safety assessment, which includes a precise DNA level characterization of inserted T-DNA. In the past, several strategies have been developed for identifying T-DNA insertion sites including, Southern blot and different PCR-based methods. However, these methods are often challenging to scale up for screening of dozens of transgenic events and for crops with complex genomes, like potato. Here, we report using target capture sequencing (TCS) to characterize the T-DNA structure and insertion sites of 34 transgenic events in potato. This T-DNA is an 18 kb fragment between left and right borders and carries three resistance (R) genes (RB, Rpi-blb2 and Rpi-vnt1.1 genes) that result in complete resistance to late blight disease. Using TCS, we obtained a high sequence read coverage within the T-DNA and junction regions. We identified the T-DNA breakpoints on either ends for 85% of the transgenic events. About 74% of the transgenic events had their T-DNA with 3R gene sequences intact. The flanking sequences of the T-DNA were from the potato genome for half of the transgenic events, and about a third (11) of the transgenic events have a single T-DNA insertion mapped into the potato genome, of which five events do not interrupt an existing potato gene. The TCS results were confirmed using PCR and Sanger sequencing for 6 of the best transgenic events representing 20% of the transgenic events suitable for regulatory approval. These results demonstrate the wide applicability of TCS for the precise T-DNA insertion characterization in transgenic crops.

Keywords: T-DNA insertions; genetically engineered crops.; regulation of GM crops; target capture sequencing; transgenic events.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Coverage of paired reads mapped to the T-DNA at 90% and 97% sequence identity obtained from target capture sequencing of the potato transgenic event Vic.172.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Breakpoint positions (blue dots) along the T-DNA of pCIP99 (24,818bp) at the junctions of the left and right end of the inserted T-DNA into potato transgenic events.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Nature of the flanking sequences of the T-DNA insertion on the left and right end. Tbr stands for potato genome.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Map position of the single T-DNA insertion of 19 potato transgenic events on the 12 chromosomal gene-maps of the potato reference genome S. tuberosum Group Phureja DM1-3. The Y axis represents the number of loci (genes) per 0.5 Mb except for chr02, 05, and 11 where it is per 0.2 Mb. The X axis represents the chr length in Mb.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akritidis P., Pasentsis K., Tsaftaris A. S., Mylona P. V., Polidoros A. N. (2008). Identification of unknown genetically modified material admixed in conventional cotton seed and development of an event-specific detection method. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 11, 76–83. doi: 10.4067/S0717-34582008000200010 - DOI
    1. Anand A., Jones T. J. (2018). ““Advancing agrobacterium-based crop transformation and genome modification technology for agricultural biotechnology”,” in Agrobacterium biology. Ed. Gelvin S. B. (Springer International Publishing AG; ), 489–507. doi: 10.1007/82_2018_97 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bartlett J. G., Smedley M. A., Harwood W. A. (2014). Analysis of T-DNA/host-plant DNA junction sequences in single-copy transgenic barley lines. Biology 3, 39–55. doi: 10.3390/biology3010039 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodi K., Perera A. G., Adams P. S., Bintzler D., Dewar K., Grove D. S., et al. . (2013). Comparison of commercially available target enrichment methods for next-generation sequencing. J. Biomol. Tech. 24, 73–86. doi: 10.7171/jbt.13-2402-002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brink K., Anitha S. C., Beatty M. K., Anderson J. A., Lyon M., Weaver J., et al. . (2019). Comparison of southern-by-Sequencing (SbSTM) technology and southern blot analysis for molecular characterization of genetically modified crops. J. Regul. Sci., 7, 1–14. doi: 10.21423/JRS-V07BRINK - DOI