Desensitization Protocol for Cemiplimab-Related Infusion Reaction in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
- PMID: 37504351
- PMCID: PMC10378378
- DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070491
Desensitization Protocol for Cemiplimab-Related Infusion Reaction in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Literature Review
Abstract
Background: The landscape of systemic therapies for advanced non-melanoma skin cancers has been revolutionized by the advent of immunotherapy. Cemiplimab is the only immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) approved by the European Medicine Agency for recurrent/metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). Its excellent efficacy outcomes are achieved due to its good tolerability profile. The drug-related hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) is a well-known issue in oncology, but it is rarely reported in respect to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cemiplimab is among the agents with the best infusion tolerability profiles. Clinical practice guidelines in this field are lacking.
Results: We report on the successful management of a severe infusion reaction induced by Cemiplimab in a patient with cSCC based on a desensitization protocol, which led to adequate treatment delivery and prolonged clinical benefit. A review of the available literature on HSR rates and its management with ICIs, and on drug desensitization (DD) protocols and their efficacy, was conducted to highlight the limited knowledge on this topic and its importance.
Conclusion: Our experience highlights the need for a DD protocol in order to improve the treatment of HSRs, particularly when elicited by an immunotherapy agent, preventing treatment discontinuation and preserving its efficacy.
Keywords: Cemiplimab; cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; drug desensitization; drug-related infusion reaction.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Ciążyńska M., Kamińska-Winciorek G., Lange D., Lewandowski B., Reich A., Sławińska M., Pabianek M., Szczepaniak K., Hankiewicz A., Ułańska M., et al. Author Correction: The incidence and clinical analysis of non-melanoma skin cancer. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:15705. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94435-7. Erratum in Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4337. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kauvar A.N., Arpey C.J., Hruza G., Olbricht S.M., Bennett R., Mahmoud B.H. Consensus for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Treatment, Part II: Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Including a Cost Analysis of Treatment Methods. Dermatol. Surg. 2015;41:1214–1240. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000478. Erratum in Dermatol. Surg. 2016, 42, 443. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Stratigos A., Garbe C., Lebbe C., Malvehy J., del Marmol V., Pehamberger H., Peris K., Becker J.C., Zalaudek I., Saiag P., et al. Diagnosis and treatment of invasive squamous cell carcinoma of the skin: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline. Eur. J. Cancer. 2015;51:1989–2007. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.06.110. - DOI - PubMed
-
- European Medicines Agency Libtayo Epar. [(accessed on 24 May 2023)];2019 Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/libtayo-epar-....
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical