Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 24;13(7):686.
doi: 10.3390/membranes13070686.

Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients

Affiliations

Safety and Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Removal CO2RESET Device in Critically Ill Patients

Fabio Silvio Taccone et al. Membranes (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: In this retrospective study, we report the effectiveness and safety of a dedicated extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) device in critically ill patients.

Methods: Adult patients on mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or decompensated chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (dCOPD), who were treated with a dedicated ECCO2R device (CO2RESET, Eurosets, Medolla, Italy) in case of hypercapnic acidemia, were included. Repeated measurements of CO2 removal (VCO2) at baseline and 1, 12, and 24 h after the initiation of therapy were recorded.

Results: Over a three-year period, 11 patients received ECCO2R (median age 60 [43-72] years) 3 (2-39) days after ICU admission; nine patients had ARDS and two had dCOPD. Median baseline pH and PaCO2 levels were 7.27 (7.12-7.33) and 65 (50-84) mmHg, respectively. With a median ECCO2R blood flow of 800 (500-800) mL/min and maximum gas flow of 6 (2-14) L/min, the VCO2 at 12 h after ECCO2R initiation was 157 (58-183) mL/min. Tidal volume, respiratory rate, and driving pressure were significantly reduced over time. Few side effects were reported.

Conclusions: In this study, a dedicated ECCO2R device provided a high VCO2 with a favorable risk profile.

Keywords: ARDS; CO2 removal; complications; extracorporeal; high blood flow; respiratory failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

F.S.T., M.D.N., M.B., L.M.B. and M.V.M. are on the Advisory Board of EUROSETS srl.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representation of the CO2RESET device (left) and the membrane lung (right).
Figure 2
Figure 2
CO2 removal (VCO2) over time. * indicates significant differences with baseline values.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Tidal volume, respiratory rate, and driving pressure change over time. * indicates significant differences with baseline values.

References

    1. Marini J.J. Mechanical ventilation: Past lessons and the near future. Crit. Care. 2013;17:S1. doi: 10.1186/cc11499. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dreyfuss D., Soler P., Basset G., Saumon G. High inflation pressure pulmonary edema. Respective effects of high airway pressure, high tidal volume, and positive end-expiratory pressure. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1988;137:1159–1164. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/137.5.1159. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Silva P.L., Ball L., Rocco P.R.M., Pelosi P. Physiological and Pathophysiological Consequences of Mechanical Ventilation. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2022;43:321–334. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1744447. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jaber S., Jung B., Matecki S., Petrof B.J. Clinical review: Ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction-human studies confirm animal model findings! Crit. Care. 2011;15:206. doi: 10.1186/cc10023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fan E., Del Sorbo L., Goligher E.C., Hodgson C.L., Munshi L., Walkey A.J., Adhikari N.K.J., Amato M.B.P., Branson R., Brower R.G., et al. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2017;195:1253–1263. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0548ST. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources