Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 15;11(7):616.
doi: 10.3390/toxics11070616.

Gender Differences in the Severity of Cadmium Nephropathy

Affiliations

Gender Differences in the Severity of Cadmium Nephropathy

Supabhorn Yimthiang et al. Toxics. .

Abstract

The excretion of β2-microglobulin (β2M) above 300 µg/g creatinine, termed tubulopathy, was regarded as the critical effect of chronic exposure to the metal pollutant cadmium (Cd). However, current evidence suggests that Cd may induce nephron atrophy, resulting in a reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Herein, these pathologies were investigated in relation to Cd exposure, smoking, diabetes, and hypertension. The data were collected from 448 residents of Cd-polluted and non-polluted regions of Thailand. The body burden of Cd, indicated by the mean Cd excretion (ECd), normalized to creatinine clearance (Ccr) as (ECd/Ccr) × 100 in women and men did not differ (3.21 vs. 3.12 µg/L filtrate). After adjustment of the confounding factors, the prevalence odds ratio (POR) for tubulopathy and a reduced eGFR were increased by 1.9-fold and 3.2-fold for every 10-fold rise in the Cd body burden. In women only, a dose-effect relationship was seen between β2M excretion (Eβ2M/Ccr) and ECd/Ccr (F = 3.431, η2 0.021). In men, Eβ2M/Ccr was associated with diabetes (β = 0.279). In both genders, the eGFR was inversely associated with Eβ2M/Ccr. The respective covariate-adjusted mean eGFR values were 16.5 and 12.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 lower in women and men who had severe tubulopathy ((Eβ2M/Ccr) × 100 ≥ 1000 µg/L filtrate). These findings indicate that women were particularly susceptible to the nephrotoxicity of Cd, and that the increment of Eβ2M/Ccr could be attributable mostly to Cd-induced impairment in the tubular reabsorption of the protein together with Cd-induced nephron loss, which is evident from an inverse relationship between Eβ2M/Ccr and the eGFR.

Keywords: GFR; cadmium; diabetes; hypertension; smoking; tubular proteinuria; β2-microglobulin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Blood cadmium and urinary cadmium excretion relationship. Scatterplots relating log([Cd]b × 103] to log[(ECd/Ccr) × 105] in women and men (a). Coefficients of determination (R2) and p-values are provided for all scatterplots. Bar graph (b) depicts mean log([Cd]b × 103] values in women and men across ECd/Ccr tertiles. Letters a and c refer to groups of women whose ECd/Ccr values were in low and middle ECd/Ccr tertiles, respectively. Letters b and d refer to groups of men whose ECd/Ccr values were in low and middle ECd/Ccr tertiles, respectively. All means were obtained via univariate analysis with adjustment for covariates and interactions. For women, respective arithmetic means and standard deviations (SD) for (ECd/Ccr) × 100 tertiles 1, 2, and 3 are 0.37 (0.47), 2.34 (0.52), and 6.84 (4.46) µg/L of filtrate. For men, respective arithmetic means and standard deviations (SD) for (ECd/Ccr) × 100 tertiles quartiles 1, 2, and 3 are 0.36 (0.42), 2.14 (0.63), and 6.81 (3.78) µg/L of filtrate. For all tests, p-values ≤ 0.05 indicate statistically significant differences.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dose–effect relationship of β2-microgloubulin and cadmium excretion. Scatterplots relate log[(EβM/Ccr) × 103] to log[(ECd/Ccr) × 105] in all subjects (a), and in women and men (c). Coefficients of determination (R2) and p-values are provided for all scatterplots. The color-coded area graph (b) depicts means of log[(Eβ2M/Ccr) × 103] across ECd/Ccr tertiles. Shaded areas indicate variability of means. Bar graph (d) depicts mean log[(Eβ2M/Ccr) × 103] in women and men in each ECd/Ccr tertile. The respective numbers of subjects in ECd/Ccr tertiles 1, 2, and 3 are 149, 149, and 150. In Figure 2d, a letter a refers to a group of women whose ECd/Ccr values were in low ECd/Ccr tertile. All means were obtained via univariate analysis with adjustment for covariates and interaction. For women, respective arithmetic means and standard deviations (SD) for (ECd/Ccr) × 100 tertiles 1, 2, and 3 are 0.37 (0.47), 2.34 (0.52), and 6.84 (4.46) µg/L of filtrate. For men, respective arithmetic means and standard deviations (SD) for (ECd/Ccr) × 100 tertiles 1, 2, and 3 are 0.36 (0.42), 2.14 (0.63), and 6.81 (3.78) µg/L of filtrate. For all tests, p-values ≤ 0.05 indicate statistically significant differences.
Figure 3
Figure 3
An inverse relationship of eGFR with β2-microgloubulin excretion. Scatterplots relate eGFR to log[(EβM/Ccr) × 103] in all subjects (a), and in women and men (c). Coefficients of determination (R2) and p-values are provided for all scatterplots. The color-coded area graph (b) depicts means of eGFR across three Eβ2M/Ccr ranges. Shaded areas indicate variability of means. Bar graph (d) depicts means of eGFR in women and men in each Eβ2M/Ccr range. The respective numbers of subjects in (Eβ2M/Ccr) × 100 < 300, 300−999 and ≥1000 µg/L of filtrate are 184, 156, and 109. In Figure 3d, letters a and c refer to groups of women whose (Eβ2M/Ccr) × 100 < 300 and 300–999 µg/L filtrate, respectively. The letter b refers to a group of men whose (Eβ2M/Ccr) × 100 < 300 µg/L filtrate, respectively. All means were obtained via univariate analysis with adjustment for covariates and interaction. For all tests, p-values ≤ 0.05 indicate statistically significant differences.
Figure 3
Figure 3
An inverse relationship of eGFR with β2-microgloubulin excretion. Scatterplots relate eGFR to log[(EβM/Ccr) × 103] in all subjects (a), and in women and men (c). Coefficients of determination (R2) and p-values are provided for all scatterplots. The color-coded area graph (b) depicts means of eGFR across three Eβ2M/Ccr ranges. Shaded areas indicate variability of means. Bar graph (d) depicts means of eGFR in women and men in each Eβ2M/Ccr range. The respective numbers of subjects in (Eβ2M/Ccr) × 100 < 300, 300−999 and ≥1000 µg/L of filtrate are 184, 156, and 109. In Figure 3d, letters a and c refer to groups of women whose (Eβ2M/Ccr) × 100 < 300 and 300–999 µg/L filtrate, respectively. The letter b refers to a group of men whose (Eβ2M/Ccr) × 100 < 300 µg/L filtrate, respectively. All means were obtained via univariate analysis with adjustment for covariates and interaction. For all tests, p-values ≤ 0.05 indicate statistically significant differences.

Similar articles

References

    1. Satarug S., Baker J.R., Reilly P.E., Moore M.R., Williams D.J. Cadmium levels in the lung, liver, kidney cortex, and urine samples from Australians without occupational exposure to metals. Arch. Environ. Health. 2002;57:69–77. doi: 10.1080/00039890209602919. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barregard L., Fabricius-Lagging E., Lundh T., Mölne J., Wallin M., Olausson M., Modigh C., Sallsten G. Cadmium, mercury, and lead in kidney cortex of living kidney donors: Impact of different exposure sources. Environ. Res. 2010;110:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2009.10.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barregard L., Sallsten G., Lundh T., Mölne J. Low-level exposure to lead, cadmium and mercury, and histopathological findings in kidney biopsies. Environ. Res. 2022;211:113119. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113119. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Satarug S., Vesey D.A., Gobe G.C., Phelps K.R. Estimation of health risks associated with dietary cadmium exposure. Arch. Toxicol. 2023;97:329–358. doi: 10.1007/s00204-022-03432-w. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watanabe T., Kataoka Y., Hayashi K., Matsuda R., Uneyama C. Dietary exposure of the Japanese general population to elements: Total diet study 2013–2018. Food Saf. 2022;10:83–101. doi: 10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.D-22-00003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed