Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug:99:101218.
doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 Jun 16.

Social relationship provisions and loneliness in school: Child- and classroom-level effects

Affiliations

Social relationship provisions and loneliness in school: Child- and classroom-level effects

Paula K S Yust et al. J Sch Psychol. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Building on social needs theory (Weiss, 1974), this study introduces the construct of classroom provision richness and examines the association between the exchange of social provisions among children in classrooms and children's feelings of loneliness in school. We examined the receipt of provisions from reciprocally nominated friends versus unilateral (one-sided) and non-friend classmates and examined associations between social provisions and loneliness at the child and classroom levels. Participants were 998 third- through fifth-grade children (468 girls, 530 boys; 88.5% White) in 38 classrooms who indicated which classmates they played with, helped, validated, and provided opportunities for self-disclosure. In addition to the social provisions nomination measure, children responded to (a) a measure of loneliness that avoided content overlapping with social provisions, (b) a rating-scale sociometric measure of peer acceptance, and (c) a measure that asked them to indicate which classmates engaged in prosocial, aggressive, or withdrawn-type behaviors. Multilevel analyses indicated that social provisions received from reciprocal friends and from unilateral-received friends were associated with children's feelings of loneliness in school. Furthermore, a measure of the provision richness of classrooms moderated the association between child-level provisions received and feelings of loneliness, such that children who received fewer provisions were less lonely in classrooms that were more provision-rich. Classroom provision richness was also associated with the general level of prosocial behavior and peer acceptance in the classroom. Together, findings suggest that efforts to foster the exchange of social provisions in classrooms could reduce loneliness and facilitate a more caring classroom environment.

Keywords: Classroom-level effects; Friendship; Loneliness; Peer relations; Social needs theory; Social relationship provisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Graphical Representation of the Interaction Between Child- and Classroom-Level Provisions Received from Same-Gender Classmates
Note. In (a), effects of provisions received from same-gender (SG) classmates are plotted for classrooms that are low, average, and high in provisions received from same-gender classmates. For low-provisions classrooms, simple intercept = 20.39 (se = 0.63), p < .001, simple slope = −16.16 (se = 2.89), p < .001; for average-provisions classrooms, simple intercept = 19.81 (se = 0.57), p < .001, simple slope = −12.86 (se = 2.05), p < .001; for high-provisions classrooms, simple intercept = 19.11 (se = 0.68), p < .001, simple slope = −8.83 (se = 2.50), p < .001. In (b), effects of classroom-level provisions received from same-gender classmates are plotted for children who are low, average, and high in provisions received from same-gender classmates. For low-provisions children, simple intercept = 21.19 (se = 0.64), p < .001, simple slope = −20.53 (se = 7.18), p = .004; for average-provisions children, simple intercept = 19.82 (se = 0.57), p < .001, simple slope = −12.71 (se = 6.02), p = .03; for high-provisions children, simple intercept = 18.37 (se = 0.59), p < .001, simple slope = −4.46 (se = 7.23), p = .537.

References

    1. Asher SR, Hopmeyer A, Weeks MS, Guerra VS, & Gabriel SW (2023). Children’s loneliness in different school contexts [Manuscript in preparation]. Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University.
    1. Asher SR, Hymel S, & Renshaw PD (1984). Loneliness in children. Child Development, 55(4), 1456–1464. 10.2307/1130015 - DOI
    1. Asher SR, & Paquette JA (2003). Loneliness and peer relations in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(3), 75–78. 10.1111/1467-8721.01233 - DOI
    1. Asher SR, Parker JG, & Walker DL (1996). Distinguishing friendship from acceptance: Implications for intervention and assessment. In Bukowski WM, Newcomb AF, & Hartup WW (Eds.), The company they keep: Friendship in childhood and adolescence (pp. 366–405). Cambridge University Press.
    1. Asher SR, Singleton LC, Tinsley BR, & Hymel S (1979). A reliable sociometric measure for preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 15(4), 443–444. 10.1037/0012-1649.15.4.443 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources