Influence of Anti-Coccidial Compounds and Phytogenic Saponin Extracts on In Vitro and In Vivo Ruminal Fermentation and Methane Production of Cattle
- PMID: 37508084
- PMCID: PMC10376241
- DOI: 10.3390/ani13142308
Influence of Anti-Coccidial Compounds and Phytogenic Saponin Extracts on In Vitro and In Vivo Ruminal Fermentation and Methane Production of Cattle
Abstract
Four experiments were conducted to evaluate sources of anti-coccidial compounds and phytogenic saponin extracts on in vitro and in vivo ruminal fermentation and CH4 production at multiple inclusion levels. In experiment 1, eight steers were fed either a finishing diet or a finishing diet supplemented with 0.5 mg/kg BW decoquinate (DCQ) and 3.33 mg/kg BW Yucca schidigera extract (YSE), and respiratory gas exchange was measured. In experiment 2, four ruminally-cannulated steers were fed the same treatments as experiment 1, and ruminal fermentation was evaluated. Anti-coccidial sources (experiment 3; monensin, DCQ, amprolium) and saponin sources (experiment 4; YSE, Quillaja saponaria extract) and levels were evaluated for effects on in vitro ruminal fermentation and CH4 production. DCQ + YSE supplementation did not influence (p ≥ 0.24) in vivo respiratory gas consumption/production, in situ DM degradation, or liquid passage kinetics. Ruminal propionate proportion tended to increase (p = 0.09) with DCQ + YSE. Monensin decreased (p ≤ 0.04) in vitro acetate:propionate and CH4 production; saponin supplementation linearly increased (p < 0.01) propionate proportion but did not influence (p ≥ 0.38) in vitro CH4 production. Saponins and non-antibiotic anti-coccidials did not influence in vitro or in vivo CH4 production with finishing diets.
Keywords: Quillaja saponaria extract; Yucca schidigera extract; amprolium; decoquinate; feed additive; feedlot nutrition; monensin; ruminal digestion; terpenes.
Conflict of interest statement
Kreikemeier, K.K. is employed by Foote Cattle Co., Hoxie, KS, which provided partial support for the conduct of this research. Foote, S. is CEO of Foote Cattle Co., Hoxie, KS which provided partial support for the conduct of this research.
References
-
- Moss A.R., Jouany J.P., Newbold J. Methane production by ruminants: Its contribution to global warming. Ann. Zootech. 2000;49:231–253. doi: 10.1051/animres:2000119. - DOI
-
- Arndt C., Hristov A.N., Price W.J., McClelland S.C., Pelaez A.M., Cueva S.F., Oh J., Dijkstra J., Bannink A., Bayat A.R., et al. Full adoption of the most effective strategies to mitigate methane emissions by ruminants can help meet the 1.5 °C target by 2030 but not 2050. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2022;119:e2111294119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2111294119. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hales K.E., Coppin C.A., Smith Z.K., McDaniel Z.S., Tedeschi L.O., Cole N.A., Galyean M.L. Predicting metabolizable energy from digestible energy for growing and finishing beef cattle and relationships to the prediction of methane. J. Anim. Sci. 2022;100:skac013. doi: 10.1093/jas/skac013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources