Clinicopathological Profiles Associated with Discordant RAS Mutational Status between Liquid and Tissue Biopsies in a Real-World Cohort of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
- PMID: 37509239
- PMCID: PMC10377339
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143578
Clinicopathological Profiles Associated with Discordant RAS Mutational Status between Liquid and Tissue Biopsies in a Real-World Cohort of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Abstract
We aimed to identify common mCRC profiles associated with a discordant mutational status of RAS between the standard of care (SoC) tumour tissue tests and ctDNA tests to understand ctDNA detection and improve treatment responses. This was a multicentre, retrospective and prospective study. A total of 366 Spanish mCRC patients were independently recruited. BEAMing ddPCR technology was employed to detect ctDNA RAS mutations, and logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate clinicopathological factors associated with discordance. The highest concordance ratios were observed in profiles with multiple metastatic sites when the liver was present (89.7%; 95% CI 84.8-93.2), profiles with synchronous disease without primary tumour resection (90.2%; 95% CI 83.6-94.3) and profiles with mCRC originating in the left colon (91.3%; 95% CI 85.0-95.0). Metachronous disease originating in the right colon (OR = 6.1; 95% CI 1.7-26.5; p-value = 0.006) or rectum (OR = 5.0; 95% CI 1.5-17.8; p-value = 0.009) showed the highest probability of discrepancies. Primary tumour resection and a higher frequency of single metastases in the peritoneum or lungs in these patients were associated with reduced plasmatic mutation allele fractions (MAFs) and an increased probability of showing false-negative genotypes. Additional testing of patients with mCRC originating in the right colon or rectum with a single non-mutated ctDNA test is advised before the choice of therapy.
Keywords: RAS; anti-EGFR therapy; colorectal cancer; ctDNA; liquid biopsy; mCRC; metastatic colorectal cancer.
Conflict of interest statement
E.B-V. has received travel accommodations and expenses from Lilly, Merck, Amgem, Roche, Servier, LEO Pharma, Rovi, Sanofi, Pfizer; honoraria for educational activities from LEO Pharma, Rovi, Roche, Kiowa Kirin, Merck, Bayer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi; honoraria for consultancies from Servier, Pfizer. J.C has received honoraria and expenses for consultancy and educational activities from Merck, Amgen, Servier, MSD and Bayer. A.F-M.has has received honoraria for educational activities from Amgen and Merck. F.V.I. has received travel accommodations and expenses from Roche and Servier; honoraria for educational or consultancy activities from Roche, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Servier and MSD; honoraria for consultancies from Servier, Pfizer. L. M-R. has received honoraria for educational or consultancy activities from Novartis and Merck, outside of the submitted work. R.L. reports grants and personal fees from Roche, Merck, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pharmamar, Leo and personal fees and nonfinancial support from Bristol-Myers Squibb and Novartis, outside of the submitted work.
Figures

References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous