Understanding the Impact of COVID-19 on Angioplasty Service and Outcome of Patients Treated for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study
- PMID: 37509673
- PMCID: PMC10377405
- DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11072034
Understanding the Impact of COVID-19 on Angioplasty Service and Outcome of Patients Treated for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
We evaluated the impact of COVID-19 restriction on the angioplasty service and outcome of chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) patients undergoing lower-limb angioplasty in a UK secondary care setting. Consecutive patients were analysed retrospectively. Pre-COVID-19 (08/2018-02/2020), 106 CLTI patients (91% Fontaine 4; 60% diabetes mellitus) and during COVID-19 (03/2020-07/2021) 94 patients were treated (86% Fontaine 4; 66% diabetes mellitus). While the average monthly number of patients treated did not change, the proportion of day cases significantly increased (53% to 80%), and hospitalised patients decreased. Patients treated in ≤14/5 days after referral significantly increased to 64/63%. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (30-day/1-year) showed that neither wound healing nor mortality were significantly changed during COVID-19. In day cases, 1-year but not 30-day major amputations significantly increased, and clinically driven target-lesion revascularisation decreased during COVID-19. One-year mortality was significantly worse in hospitalised compared to day cases (14% vs. 43%) at similar wound healing rates (83% vs. 84%). The most frequent known cause of death was infectious disease (64%), while cardiovascular (21%) was less frequent. Despite COVID-19 restrictions, a safe and effective angioplasty service was maintained while shortening waiting times. Very high mortality rates in hospitalised patients may indicate that CLTI patients need to be referred and treated more aggressively earlier.
Keywords: critical limb ischaemia; day-case angioplasty; peripheral artery disease.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Song P., Rudan D., Zhu Y., Fowkes F.J.I., Rahimi K., Fowkes F.G.R., Rudan I. Global, regional, and national prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2015: An updated systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob. Health. 2019;7:e1020–e1030. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30255-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Behrendt C.A., Thomalla G., Rimmele D.L., Petersen E.L., Twerenbold R., Debus E.S., Kolbel T., Blankenberg S., Schmidt-Lauber C., Peters F., et al. Editor’s Choice—Prevalence of Peripheral Arterial Disease, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, and Risk Factors in the Hamburg City Health Study: A Cross Sectional Analysis. Eur. J. Vasc. Endovasc. Surg. 2023;65:590–598. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.01.002. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ireland, Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland Peripheral Arterial Disease-Quality Improvement Framework. 2019. [(accessed on 1 July 2023)]. Available online: https://www.vascularsociety.org.uk/_userfiles/pages/files/Newsletters/PA....
-
- Reinecke H., Unrath M., Freisinger E., Bunzemeier H., Meyborg M., Luders F., Gebauer K., Roeder N., Berger K., Malyar N.M. Peripheral arterial disease and critical limb ischaemia: Still poor outcomes and lack of guideline adherence. Eur. Heart J. 2015;36:932–938. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv006. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
