The 300 versus 300 Study-Low Volume versus High Volume Single Balloon Catheter for Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
- PMID: 37510954
- PMCID: PMC10381136
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm12144839
The 300 versus 300 Study-Low Volume versus High Volume Single Balloon Catheter for Induction of Labor: A Retrospective Case-Control Study
Abstract
The use of a Foley catheter is one of the oldest known methods of labor induction. Therefore, protocols using different volumes of Foley catheter balloons have been developed and tested to accurately determine their effectiveness. In this study, it was decided to retrospectively evaluate two induction of labor (IOL) protocols. The last 300 eligible patients who met the criteria and underwent the low-volume balloon protocol (40-60 mL) IOL were selected. Then next, 300 patients who met the criteria and underwent high-volume balloon (80-100 mL) IOL were selected. Outcomes included time to delivery and parturition type, oxytocin augmentation, operative deliveries and application of intrapartum anesthesia. Overall, the majority of patients delivered within 24 h. Patients who received a high-volume Foley catheter had statistically significantly more vaginal deliveries. The mean-time to delivery in the high-volume catheter group was statistically significantly shorter than in the low-volume catheter group. Patients who received a high-volume Foley catheter required statistically significantly less oxytocin augmentation during induction of labor compared to patients with a low-volume Foley catheter. Regardless of the balloon volume used, the percentage of operative deliveries remained at a similar, low level (8.36% and 2.14%). Regardless of the catheter volume used, the majority of patients chose epidural over intravenous anesthesia. In conclusion, a high-volume balloon Foley catheter IOL is characterized by an increased percentage of vaginal deliveries, shortened time to delivery regardless of the type of delivery, and lower need for oxytocin augmentation.
Keywords: cesarean section; delivery; induced; labor; maternal-child nursing; midwifery; obstetric; obstetric nursing; perinatology; pregnancy; pregnancy outcome; prolonged; urinary catheters.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].Ginekol Pol. 2013 Mar;84(3):180-5. doi: 10.17772/gp/1560. Ginekol Pol. 2013. PMID: 23700844 Polish.
-
Increased single-balloon Foley catheter volume for induction of labor and time to delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Sep;97(9):1051-1060. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13353. Epub 2018 Apr 25. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018. PMID: 29607491
-
A randomized trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin for labor induction in nulliparous women.Am J Perinatol. 2004 Apr;21(3):139-46. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-823777. Am J Perinatol. 2004. PMID: 15085496 Clinical Trial.
-
Mifepristone versus balloon catheter for labor induction: a cohort study.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):9331-9335. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2031965. Epub 2022 Jan 27. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022. PMID: 35086412
-
Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and literature review.Hong Kong Med J. 2015 Jun;21(3):243-50. doi: 10.12809/hkmj144404. Epub 2015 May 22. Hong Kong Med J. 2015. PMID: 25999032 Review.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous