Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 22;13(7):1031.
doi: 10.3390/jpm13071031.

Measures of Patient-Reported Expectations, Acceptance, and Satisfaction Using Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: A Review

Affiliations
Review

Measures of Patient-Reported Expectations, Acceptance, and Satisfaction Using Automated Insulin Delivery Systems: A Review

Marco Marigliano et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

In people with type 1 diabetes, Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) systems adjust insulin delivery in response to sensor glucose data and consist of three components: an insulin pump, a continuous glucose sensor, and an algorithm that determines insulin delivery. To date, all the available AID systems require users to announce carbohydrate intake and deliver meal boluses, as well as respond to system alarms. The use of AID devices both initially and over time may be influenced by a variety of psychological factors. Analysis of patient-related outcomes should be taken into account, while recruiting applicants for the systems who are motivated and have realistic expectations in order to prevent AID dropout. We report an up-to-date summary of the available measures and semi-structured interview content to assess AID expectations, acceptance, and satisfaction using the AID systems. In conclusion, we suggest, before and after starting using AID systems, performing a specific evaluation of the related psychological implications, using validated measures and semi-structured interviews, that allows diabetes care providers to tailor their education approach to the factors that concern the patient at that time; they can teach problem-solving skills and other behavioral strategies to support sustained use of the AID system.

Keywords: AID; acceptance; expectation; satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Cherubini V., Bonfanti R., Casertano A., De Nitto E., Iannilli A., Lombardo F., Maltoni G., Marigliano M., Bassi M., Minuto N., et al. Time In Range in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Using Treatment Strategies Based on Nonautomated Insulin Delivery Systems in the Real World. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 2020;22:509–515. doi: 10.1089/dia.2020.0031. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sherr J.L., Schoelwer M., Dos Santos T.J., Reddy L., Biester T., Galderisi A., van Dyk J.C., Hilliard M.E., Berget C., DiMeglio L.A. ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Diabetes Technologies: Insulin Delivery. Pediatr. Diabetes. 2022;23:1406–1431. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13421. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rabbone I., Minuto N., Bonfanti R., Marigliano M., Cerutti F., Cherubini V., d’Annunzio G., Frongia A.P., Iafusco D., Ignaccolo G., et al. Insulin Pump Failures in Italian Children with Type 1 Diabetes: Retrospective 1-Year Cohort Study. Diabet. Med. 2017;34:621–624. doi: 10.1111/dme.13294. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group Youth and Parent Satisfaction with Clinical Use of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer in the Management of Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:1929–1935. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.8.1929. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Franceschi R., Micheli F., Mozzillo E., Cauvin V., Liguori A., Soffiati M., Giani E. Intermittently Scanned and Continuous Glucose Monitor Systems: A Systematic Review on Psychological Outcomes in Pediatric Patients. Front. Pediatr. 2021;9:660173. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.660173. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources