Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 25;13(7):1043.
doi: 10.3390/jpm13071043.

Custom-Made Metaphyseal Sleeves in "Beyond" AORI III Defects for Revision Knee Arthroplasty-Proof of Concept and Short-Term Results of a New Technique

Affiliations

Custom-Made Metaphyseal Sleeves in "Beyond" AORI III Defects for Revision Knee Arthroplasty-Proof of Concept and Short-Term Results of a New Technique

Yannik Hanusrichter et al. J Pers Med. .

Abstract

Background: While off-the-shelf cones and sleeves yield good results in AORI type 2 and 3 defects in revision knee surgery, massive longitudinal defects may require a proximal tibia replacement. To achieve the best anatomical as well as biomechanical reconstruction and preserve the tibial tuberosity, we developed custom-made metaphyseal sleeves (CMSs) to reconstruct massive defects with a hinge knee replacement.

Methods: Between 2019 and 2022, 10 patients were treated in a single-center study. The indication for revision was aseptic loosening in five cases and periprosthetic joint infection in five cases. The mean number of previous revisions after the index operations was 7 (SD: 2; 4-12). A postoperative analysis was conducted to evaluate the functional outcome as well as the osteointegrative potential.

Results: Implantation of the CMS in rTKA was carried out in all cases, with a mean operation time of 155 ± 48 (108-256) min. During the follow-up of 23 ± 7 (7-31) months, no CMS was revised and revisions due to other causes were conducted in five cases. Early radiographic evidence of osseointegration was recorded using a validated method. The postoperative OKS showed a significant increase (p < 0.001), with a mean score of 24 (SD: 4; range: 14-31).

Conclusion: Custom-made metaphyseal sleeves show acceptable results in extreme cases. As custom-made components become more and more common, this treatment algorithm presents a viable alternative in complex rTKA.

Keywords: AORI; cone; custom-made; periprosthetic joint infection; proximal tibial replacement; revision knee arthroplasty; sleeve; tibial bone defect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

C.G. and M.W. have received research support not related to this publication from Implantcast GmbH, Buxtehude, Germany. J.H. has received financial support for scientific projects not related to this publication from Implantcast GmbH, Buxtehude, Germany. Y.H., C.G., J.H., A.S., L.M.J. and M.W. have received speaker honoraria from Implantcast GmbH, Buxtehude, Germany. Y.H. has received a speaker honorarium from Curasan AG, Frankfurt, Germany. L.M.J. has received a speaker honorarium from Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, Indiana, United States, and Stryker Corporation, Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Exemplary surface analysis in a patient not included due to follow-up <6 months. In total, 41.70 cm2 of 56.47 cm2 (73%) in the CMS achieved osseus contact, compared to 19.48 cm2 of 36.24 cm2 (53%) in an optimally positioned cortical cone. The patient was allowed full weight bearing postoperatively and achieved a flexion of 0–10–75° 2 months postoperatively after simultaneous quadriceps augmentation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Custom-made rasps (−5 mm and size-to-size) as well as the definitive implant.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Aseptic loosening in a 77-year-old female patient (case 2). The CT scans show the combined meta-/diaphyseal AORI III defect, the planned individual component, and the final postoperative implant positioning (purple implant). The yellow lines represent the planned off-set.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Case number 9, an 80-year-old male patient with a multi-pathogen PJI treated in a two-stage exchange, showing the extensive defect, the contact analysis, and the postoperative results.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Case number 10, a 71-year-old male patient with a Staphylococcus epidermidis PJI treated in a two-stage exchange. Image 1: perioperative defect. Image 2: tibial assembly with a small modular tibial platform fixed with 2 screws. The interface between the CMS and the tibial platform was augmented with PMMA, and additional screw fixation (e.g., 4 instead of 2) was considered. Image 3: final prosthesis assembly. Image 4: preoperative rotational measurement in a 3D model. Image 5: −5 mm and size-to-size rasps with a trial assembly. Image 6: digital planning of the prosthesis. The rotation was not yet corrected. Image 7: AP and lateral views with axis measurement. Extensor mechanism pilot holes are shown in the proximal CMS.

References

    1. Sacchetti F., Aston W., Pollock R., Gikas P., Cuomo P., Gerrand C. Endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for oncological conditions. Bone Jt. Open. 2022;3:733–740. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.39.BJO-2022-0069.R1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fram B., Smith E.B., Deirmengian G.K., Abraham J.A., Strony J., Cross M.B., Ponzio D.Y. Proximal tibial replacement in revision knee arthroplasty for non-oncologic indications. Arthroplast. Today. 2020;6:23–35. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2019.11.007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Holl S., Schlomberg A., Gosheger G., Dieckmann R., Streitbuerger A., Schulz D., Hardes J. Distal femur and proximal tibia replacement with megaprosthesis in revision knee arthroplasty: A limb-saving procedure. Knee Surg. Sport. Traumatol. Arthrosc. 2012;20:2513–2518. doi: 10.1007/s00167-012-1945-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Engh G.A., Parks N.L. The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr. Course Lect. 1997;46:227–236. - PubMed
    1. Morgan-Jones R., Oussedik S.I., Graichen H., Haddad F.S. Zonal fixation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Jt. J. 2015;97-B:147–149. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34144. - DOI - PubMed