Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 30;59(7):1231.
doi: 10.3390/medicina59071231.

Optimizing Acellular Dermal Matrix Integration in Heterologous Breast Reconstructive Surgery: Surgical Tips and Post-Operative Management

Affiliations

Optimizing Acellular Dermal Matrix Integration in Heterologous Breast Reconstructive Surgery: Surgical Tips and Post-Operative Management

Glenda Caputo et al. Medicina (Kaunas). .

Abstract

Background and Objective: Prepectoral implant placement in breast reconstruction is currently a must-have in the portfolios of breast surgeons. The introduction of new tools and conservative mastectomies is a game changer in this field. The prepectoral plane usually goes hand-in-hand with the ADM wrapping of the implant. It is a cell-free dermal matrix comprising a structurally integrated basement membrane complex and an extracellular matrix. The literature reports that ADMs may be useful, but proper patient selection, surgical placement, and post-operative management are essential to unlock the potential of this tool, as these factors contribute to the proper integration of the matrix with surrounding tissues. Materials and Methods: A total of 245 prepectoral breast reconstructions with prostheses or expanders and ADMs were performed in our institution between 2016 and 2022. A retrospective study was carried out to record patient characteristics, risk factors, surgical procedures, reconstructive processes, and complications. Based on our experience, we developed a meticulous reconstruction protocol in order to optimize surgical practice and lower complication rates. The DTI and two-stage reconstruction were compared. Results: Seroma formation was the most frequent early complication (less than 90 days after surgery) that we observed; however, the majority were drained in outpatient settings and healed rapidly. Secondary healing of wounds, which required a few more weeks of dressing, represented the second most frequent early complication (10.61%). Rippling was the most common late complication, particularly in DTI patients. After comparing the DTI and two-stage reconstruction, no statistically significant increase in complications was found. Conclusions: The weakness of prepectoral breast reconstruction is poor matrix integration, which leads to seroma and other complications. ADM acts like a graft; it requires firm and healthy tissues to set in. In order to do so, there are three key steps to follow: (1) adequate patient selection; (2) preservative and gentle handling of intra-operative technique; and (3) meticulous post-operative management.

Keywords: ADM integration; breast reconstruction; breast surgery; dermal matrix; heterologous reconstruction; implant-based reconstruction; prepectoral reconstruction ADM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Before and after pictures of a young patient who underwent skin-reducing mastectomy and DTI reconstruction.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Before and after pictures of an older patient who underwent skin-reducing mastectomy with two-stage reconstruction.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Snyderman R.K., Guthrie R.H. Reconstruction of the female breast following radical mastectomy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1971;47:565–567. doi: 10.1097/00006534-197106000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sbitany H. Breast Reconstruction. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2018;98:845–857. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2018.03.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rebowe R.E., Allred L.J., Nahabedian M.Y. The Evolution from Subcutaneous to Prepectoral Prosthetic Breast Reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open. 2018;6:e1797. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001797. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spear S.L., Schwartz J., Dayan J.H., Clemens M.W. Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2009;33:44–48. doi: 10.1007/s00266-008-9275-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li S., Mu D., Liu C., Xin M., Fu S., Xu B., Li Z., Qi J., Luan J. Complications Following Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: A Meta-analysis. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2019;43:890–898. doi: 10.1007/s00266-019-01404-7. - DOI - PubMed