Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Jul 8;15(14):3080.
doi: 10.3390/nu15143080.

Meat Consumption and Availability for Its Reduction by Health and Environmental Concerns: A Pilot Study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Meat Consumption and Availability for Its Reduction by Health and Environmental Concerns: A Pilot Study

Andrea Turnes et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

(1) Background: Excessive meat consumption has raised multiple health and environmental concerns; however, there are no data on the population's willingness to reduce its intake for these reasons. The current study aims to assess the frequency of meat intake and readiness to limit consumption due to concern about the impact on health and the environment in residents of the Lisbon metropolitan region. (2) Methods: This analytical cross-sectional observational study was carried out in 197 residents in the metropolitan region of Lisbon. The participants were divided into two groups by age (GI: 20-29 years; GII: 40-64 years). Meat consumption and willingness to reduce it were assessed through a questionnaire. (3) Results: Most participants (67%) reported not having knowledge about the ecological footprint of meat. Being a less frequent meat consumer (<1 time per day) is associated with a willingness 3.6 times higher (p < 0.001) to reduce meat consumption due to sensitivity to the impact on health and 4.0 times higher (p < 0.001) due to environmental reasons. (4) Conclusions: Lower meat consumption frequency was associated with reductions in this consumption for environmental and health reasons.

Keywords: consumption; ecological footprint; environment; health; meat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Balança Alimentar Portuguesa 2016–2020. [(accessed on 8 May 2023)]. Available online: file:///C:/Users/valen/Downloads/BAP_2016_2020%20(3).pdf.
    1. Bento A., Gonçalves C., Cordeiro T., Vaz de Almeida M.D. Portugal nutritional transition during the last 4 decades: 1974–2011. Porto Biomed. J. 2018;3:e25. doi: 10.1016/j.pbj.0000000000000025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monteiro M., Fontes T., Ferreira-Pêgo C. Nutrition literacy of portuguese adults—A pilot study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021;18:3177. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063177. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inquérito Alimentar Nacional Relatório Resultados 2015–2016. [(accessed on 8 May 2023)]. Available online: https://ian-af.up.pt/sites/default/files/IAN-AF%20Relat%C3%B3rio%20Resul....
    1. National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey of the Portuguese General Population. [(accessed on 8 May 2023)]. Available online: https://www.ian-af.up.pt/sites/default/files/IAN-AF%20Summary%20of%20Res....

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources