Similar articles

• Screening for cervical neoplasia. A survey of the assumptions from studies on the screening in Maribo Amt.

  Berget A. Berget A. Dan Med Bull. 1979 Nov;26(7):313-32. Dan Med Bull. 1979. PMID: 118850 Review. No abstract available.
• [Round table: Carcinoma of the cervix uteri].

  Escudero P, Saavedra R, Martínez L, Salas O, Morales E, González J. Escudero P, et al. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 1982;47(1):30-45. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol. 1982. PMID: 6927318 Spanish. No abstract available.
• Progression of 189 women diagnosed with uterine cervical dysplasia based on abnormal results in mass screening.

  Muramatsu T, Yoshitake T, Iida T, Yamashita E, Hirasawa T, Miyamoto T, Murakami M, Matsui N, Kajiwara H, Yasuda M, Osamura RY, Mikami M. Muramatsu T, et al. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2006 Dec 20;31(4):141-5. Tokai J Exp Clin Med. 2006. PMID: 21302243
• [Discussion of the diagnosis and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].

  Zhang WH, Li SM. Zhang WH, et al. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Apr;31(4):316-8. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 19615293 Chinese. No abstract available.
• [Cytological classifications of vaginal smears. Current concepts of complex cytodiagnosis].

  Kasabova M. Kasabova M. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 1984;23(4):357-64. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 1984. PMID: 6385754 Review. Bulgarian. No abstract available.