Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;30(41):93731-93743.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28876-0. Epub 2023 Jul 29.

Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota of wild wintering whooper swans (Cygnus Cygnus), captive black swans (Cygnus Atratus), and mute swans (Cygnus Olor) in Sanmenxia Swan National Wetland Park of China

Affiliations

Comparative analysis of the gut microbiota of wild wintering whooper swans (Cygnus Cygnus), captive black swans (Cygnus Atratus), and mute swans (Cygnus Olor) in Sanmenxia Swan National Wetland Park of China

Jun-Xian Mi et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

The gastrointestinal microbiota, a complex ecosystem, is involved in the physiological activities of hosts and the development of diseases. Birds occupy a critical ecological niche in the ecosystem, performing a variety of ecological functions and possessing a complex gut microbiota composition. However, the gut microbiota of wild and captive birds has received less attention in the same region. We profiled the fecal gut microbiome of wild wintering whooper swans (Cygnus Cygnus; Cyg group, n = 25), captive black swans (Cygnus Atratus; Atr group, n = 20), and mute swans (Cygnus Olor; Olor group, n = 30) using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to reveal differences in the gut microbial ecology. The results revealed that the three species of swans differed significantly in terms of the alpha and beta diversity of their gut microbiota, as measured by ACE, Chao1, Simpson and Shannon indices, principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) and non-metricmulti-dimensional scaling (NMDS) respectively. Based on the results of the linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) and random forest analysis, we found that there were substantial differences in the relative abundance of Gottschalkia, Trichococcus, Enterococcus, and Kurthia among the three groups. Furthermore, an advantageous pattern of interactions between microorganisms was shown by the association network analysis. Among these, Gottschalkia had the higher area under curve (AUC), which was 0.939 (CI = 0.879-0.999), indicating that it might be used as a biomarker to distinguish between wild and captive black swans. Additionally, PICRUSt2 predictions indicated significant differences in gut microbiota functions between wild and captive trumpeter swans, with the gut microbiota functions of Cyg group focusing on carbohydrate metabolism, membrane transport, cofactor, and vitamin metabolism pathways, the Atr group on lipid metabolism, and the Olor group on cell motility, amino acid metabolism, and replication and repair pathways. These findings showed that the gut microbiota of wild and captive swans differed, which is beneficial to understand the gut microecology of swans and to improve regional wildlife conservation strategies.

Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing; Bird; Cygnus; Gut microbiota; Wild and captive swans.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barbosa A, Balagué V, Valera F, Martínez A, Benzal J, Motas M, Diaz JI, Mira A, Pedrós-Alió C (2016) Age-related differences in the gastrointestinal microbiota of chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica). PLoS One 11:e0153215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153215 - DOI
    1. Bodawatta KH, Hird SM, Grond K, Poulsen M, Jønsson KA (2022) Avian gut microbiomes taking flight. Trends Microbiol 30:268–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2021.07.003 - DOI
    1. Cabrera-Mulero A, Tinahones A, Bandera B, Moreno-Indias I, Macías-González M, Tinahones FJ (2019) Keto microbiota: a powerful contributor to host disease recovery. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 20:415–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-019-09518-8 - DOI
    1. Chi L, Tu P, Ru H, Lu K (2021) Studies of xenobiotic-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis: from correlation to mechanisms. Gut Microbes 13:1921912. https://doi.org/10.1080/19490976.2021.1921912 - DOI
    1. Cho H, Lee WY (2020) Interspecific comparison of the fecal microbiota structure in three Arctic migratory bird species. Ecol Evol 10:5582–5594. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6299 - DOI

Substances

LinkOut - more resources