Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2025 Mar;28(1):203-207.
doi: 10.1007/s40477-023-00807-2. Epub 2023 Jul 29.

Levonorgestrel intrauterine device with absence of threads: don't take expulsion for granted! A case series of possible errors in ultrasound evaluation, in case of "lost IUDs"

Affiliations
Case Reports

Levonorgestrel intrauterine device with absence of threads: don't take expulsion for granted! A case series of possible errors in ultrasound evaluation, in case of "lost IUDs"

Paola Algeri et al. J Ultrasound. 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Levonorgestel intrauterine devices are safe contraceptive methods, with even medical indications. However, they may present rare, but severe complications such as perforation and abdominal dislocation. Ultrasound assessment may be limited if a medicate intrauterine device is lost, due to its particular echogenicity. We report cases complicated by loss of intrauterine devices. Based on this experience we believe that ultrasound should always be associated to an X-ray examination to prevent misdiagnosis, especially in case of loss of a levonorgestrel device. Although our conclusions are not innovative and the cases are limited, we believe they can be a reminder in clinical practice to avoid not so infrequent complications and clinical errors. We would also like to recall the limitations of ultrasound in locating levonorgestrel intra uterine devices and stress that one should never take for granted the expulsion of the device in case of lost its threads.

Keywords: Intrauterine balloons; Levonorgestrel intrauterine device; Lost intrauterine device; Ultrasound; X-ray.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Ethics approval: This is a case report, no ethical approval is required. Consent to participate: A written informed consent was obtained from the patients. Consent to publish: The authors affirm that patient provided informed consent for publication of the images.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bahamondes L et al (2019) Long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARCs) methods. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.12.002 - PubMed
    1. Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R et al (1981) Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of IUDs. I. Classification, complications, mechanisms, incidence and missing string. Obstet Gynecol Surg 36:335–353 - PubMed
    1. Rao RP (1978) Lost intrauterine devices and their localization. J Reprod Med 20:195–199 - PubMed
    1. Gentile JP, Siegler AM (1977) The misplaced or missing IUD. Obstet Gynecol Surv 32:627–641 - PubMed
    1. Thonneau P, Goulard H, Goyaux N (2001) Risk factors for intrauterine device failure: a review. Contraception 64:33–37 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources