Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Nov;149(15):14353-14363.
doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04841-9. Epub 2023 Jul 30.

Second-hand smoke exposure and cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Second-hand smoke exposure and cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Maria Chiara Malevolti et al. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: The association between second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure and cervical cancer (CC) risk is still unclear. The aim of this study is to provide an accurate and updated estimate of this association.

Methods: Through an original methodology to identify original publications, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all epidemiological studies published up to October 2022 evaluating the association between SHS exposure and CC risk among female non-smokers. Meta-analytic estimates were obtained using random-effects models and dose-response relationships were derived using log-linear functions.

Results: Out of 25 eligible studies, 21 were included in the meta-analysis, providing a pooled relative risk (RR) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of grade 2 or higher of 1.52 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.30-1.78, 21 studies) for overall SHS exposure versus non-exposure. When restricting the analysis to invasive CC, the pooled RR was 1.42 (95% CI 1.17-1.71, 13 studies), whereas the pooled RR for CIN was 1.50 (95% CI 1.22-1.84, 6 studies). Analyzing RR by setting or source of SHS exposure resulted in significant associations with CC risk for SHS exposure at home (RR for CIN2+ 1.49, 95% CI 1.21-1.84, 14 studies), in non-specified settings (RR for CIN2+ 1.64, 95% CI 1.20-2.23, 8 studies) and from partner (RR for CIN2+ 1.55, 95% CI 1.25-1.94, 10 studies). The risk of CIN2+ significantly increased linearly with the intensity and pack-years of SHS exposure.

Conclusion: This comprehensive review and meta-analysis confirmed the association of SHS exposure with CC, further suggesting the need to raise concern about SHS exposure in the population.

Keywords: Cervical cancer; Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Dose–response relationship; Meta-analysis; Relative risk; Second-hand smoke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Forest plot and pooled relative risk (RR) of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or higher (CIN2+) for women exposed to second-hand smoke (SHS) compared to non-exposed women, overall and by study design. 95% CI 95% confidence interval, E exposed to SHS, NE non-exposed to SHS
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relative risk (RR) for the dose–response relationships between second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure intensity and pack-years, and the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or higher (CIN2+). a Hours per day of SHS exposure (based on four studies). b Cigarettes per day of SHS exposure (based on three studies). c Pack-years of SHS exposure (based on three studies). Bold line: linear regression model; line: 95% confidence interval of the restricted cubic spline or linear model; dotted line: RR for the reference category (non-exposed); bubble: RR for various exposure categories in each study included in the analysis, where the area of the circle is proportional to the precision of the RR (i.e., to the inverse variance)

References

    1. Birkett N, Al-Zoughool M, Bird M et al (2019) Overview of biological mechanisms of human carcinogens. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 22(7–8):288–359. 10.1080/10937404.2019.1643539 - PubMed
    1. Bonequi P, Meneses-González F, Correa P et al (2013) Risk factors for gastric cancer in Latin America: a meta-analysis. Cancer Causes Control 24(2):217–231. 10.1007/s10552-012-0110-z - PMC - PubMed
    1. Botteri E, Borroni E, Sloan EK et al (2020) Smoking and colorectal cancer risk, overall and by molecular subtypes: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 115(12):1940–1949. 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000803 - PubMed
    1. California Environmental Protection Agency (2005) Proposed identification of environmental tobacco smoke as a toxic air contaminant. Sacramento. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8hk6960q
    1. Carreras G, Lugo A, Gallus S et al (2019) Burden of disease attributable to second-hand smoke exposure: a systematic review. Prev Med 129:105833. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105833 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources