Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr-Jun;64(2):151-158.
doi: 10.47162/RJME.64.2.04.

S100A8∕A9 is a valuable biomarker and treatment target to detect and modulate neutrophil involvement in myocardial infarction

Affiliations

S100A8∕A9 is a valuable biomarker and treatment target to detect and modulate neutrophil involvement in myocardial infarction

Răzvan Gheorghiţă Mareş et al. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2023 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Myocardial infarction (MI) leads to irreversible ischemic damage of the heart muscle and is the leading cause of heart failure. The ischemic cardiac injury triggers a potent local and systemic immune response. In the acute phase post-MI, neutrophils infiltrate the myocardium in large numbers and induce further cardiomyocyte death, expanding the infarcted area. The alarmin S100A8∕A9 is a proinflammatory mediator primarily produced by myeloid cells, with an emerging role in MI. We previously demonstrated that short-term inhibition of S100A8∕A9 during the inflammatory phase of the immune response to MI improves long-term cardiac function. In the present study, we investigated the effects of S100A8∕A9 blockade on myocardial inflammation and post-ischemic myocardial injury in a mouse model of coronary artery ligation. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining revealed that the presence of S100A9 is strongly correlated with neutrophil infiltration in the myocardium on days 1 and 3 post-MI. A 3-day treatment with the S100A8∕A9 blocker ABR-238901 starting immediately after MI decreased the number of neutrophils and S100A9 presence in the myocardium and had a positive impact on cardiac damage, reducing infarction size. These findings promote S100A9 as an IHC biomarker of neutrophil infiltration and a promising immunomodulatory target to regulate neutrophil recruitment, reduce ischemic injury and promote long-term beneficial cardiac recovery after MI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Neutrophil infiltration and S100A9 presence in the myocardium on day 1 post-MI: (A) Representative images of HE staining of left ventricular sections from the sham and MI groups treated with PBS (MI) or ABR-238901 (MI+ABR), respectively, collected on day 1 after myocardial ischemia (400×); (B) Ly6G-positive staining identifying neutrophil infiltration (400×); (C) S100A9-positive immunohistochemical staining in the same areas as in (A) and (B) (400×). HE: Hematoxylin–Eosin; Ly6G: Lymphocyte antigen 6 family member G6D; MI: Myocardial infarction; PBS: Phosphate-buffered saline
Figure 2
Figure 2
Neutrophil infiltration and S100A9 presence in the myocardium on day 3 post-MI: (A) Representative images of HE staining of left ventricular sections from the sham and the two MI groups receiving PBS (MI) or ABR-238901 (MI+ABR) treatment, collected on day 3 post-MI (400×); (B) Ly6G-positive neutrophil staining (400×); (C) S100A9 staining in the same areas as in (A) and (B) (400×
Figure 3
Figure 3
The S100A9 presence in the infarcted myocardium reflects neutrophil infiltration and the effect of the treatment. Correlations between neutrophil infiltration, expressed as Ly6G-positive staining, and S100A9 staining in myocardium collected on day 1 (A) and day 3 (B) post-MI. The stained area is reported as an average percentage of left ventricular area on five consecutive sections collected at 300 μm intervals
Figure 4
Figure 4
Inhibition of S100A8/A9 signaling reduces the extent of MI on day 3 post-MI: (A) Representative HE staining of cardiac sections from the PBS- and ABR-238901-treated mice, three days after induced MI; (B) Masson’s trichrome staining of fibrous scar formation in the infarcted area; (C) Quantification of MI size, expressed as percentage of left ventricular (LV) volume

References

    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD; Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(18):2231–2264. - PubMed
    1. Prabhu SD, Frangogiannis NG. The biological basis for cardiac repair after myocardial infarction: from inflammation to fibrosis. Circ Res. 2016;119(1):91–112. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mares RG, Marinkovic G, Cotoi OS, Schiopu A. Innate immune mechanisms in myocardial infarction – an update. Rev Rom Med Lab. 2018;26:9–20.
    1. Yan X, Anzai A, Katsumata Y, Matsuhashi T, Ito K, Endo J, Yamamoto T, Takeshima A, Shinmura K, Shen W, Fukuda K, Sano M. Temporal dynamics of cardiac immune cell accumulation following acute myocardial infarction. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;62:24–35. - PubMed
    1. Ma Y, Yabluchanskiy A, Iyer RP, Cannon PL, Flynn ER, Jung M, Henry J, Cates CA, Deleon-Pennell KY, Lindsey ML. Temporal neutrophil polarization following myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;110(1):51–61. - PMC - PubMed