Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 4:35:102307.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102307. eCollection 2023 Oct.

Prevalence and clustering of health behaviours and the association with socio-demographics and mental well-being in Dutch university students

Affiliations

Prevalence and clustering of health behaviours and the association with socio-demographics and mental well-being in Dutch university students

Kirsten J M van Hooijdonk et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

The college years represent a vulnerable period for developing health-risk behaviours (e.g., physical inactivity/unhealthy eating habits/substance use/problematic internet use/insufficient sleep). This study examined current health behaviour levels (RQ1), health behaviour classes (RQ2) and between-class differences in socio-demographics (RQ3) and mental well-being (RQ4) among Dutch university students (n = 3771). Participants (Mage = 22.7 (SD = 4.3); 71.2% female/27.3% male/1.5% other) completed an online survey (Oct-Nov 2021). Descriptive statistics (RQ1), Latent Class Analysis (RQ2), and Kruskal-Wallis/Chi-square tests (RQ3-4) were used. RQ1: Prevalence rates suggest that a subsequent proportion of the student sample engages in health-risk behaviours. RQ2: Four classes were identified: class 1 (n = 862) "Licit substance use health-risk group", class 2 (n = 435) "Illicit and licit substance use health-risk group", class 3 (n = 1876) "Health-protective group" and class 4 (n = 598) "Non-substance use health-risk group". RQ3: Class 1 represents relatively more international students and students in a steady relationship. Class 2 represents relatively more older/male/(pre-)master students and students living with roommates/in a steady relationship/with more financial difficulty. Class 3 represents relatively more younger/female students and students living with family/with lower Body Mass Index (BMI)/less financial difficulty. Class 4 represents relatively more younger/non-Western/international/bachelor students and students living with children/single/part of LGBTIQ+ community/with higher BMI. RQ4: Class 3 has significantly higher mental well-being while class 4 has significantly lower mental well-being, relative to the other classes. Above findings provide new insights which can help educational institutes and governments better understand the clustering of students' health behaviours and between-class differences in socio-demographics and mental well-being.

Keywords: Health behaviour; Latent Class Analysis; Mental well-being; Prevention; Socio-demographics; University students.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Probabilities per health behaviour, resulting from the Latent Class Analysis (LCA) performed among Dutch university students (n = 3771; subsample of Healthy Student Life survey Oct-Nov 2021). Note. Probabilities per health behaviour and per response category are presented for all 15 health behaviours included in the LCA. Class 1 (n = 862): “Licit substance use health-risk group”. Class 2 (n = 435): “Illicit and licit substance use health-risk group”. Class 3 (n = 1876): “Health-protective group”. Class 4 (n = 598): “Non-substance use health-risk group”.

References

    1. Abdel-Khalek A.M. Measuring happiness with a single-item scale. Soc. Behav. Pers. 2006;34(2):139–150. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.139. - DOI
    1. Abdellaoui A., Smit D.J.A., van den Brink W., Denys D., Verweij K.J.H. Genomic relationships across psychiatric disorders including substance use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021;220 doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108535. - DOI - PubMed
    1. ABF Research. (2021). Landelijke monitor studentenhuisvestiging 2021. https://www.kences.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/20201105-Kences-Landeli....
    1. Alcover K.C., Thompson C.L. Patterns of mean age at drug use initiation among adolescents and emerging adults, 2004–2017. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(7):725–727. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.6235. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alvaro P.K., Roberts R.M., Harris J.K. A systematic review assessing bidirectionality between sleep disturbances, anxiety, and depression. Sleep. 2013;36(7):1059–1068. doi: 10.5665/sleep.2810. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources