Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 28;15(6):e41098.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.41098. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Screening Guidelines and Programs for Cervical Cancer Control in Countries of Different Economic Groups: A Narrative Review

Affiliations
Review

Screening Guidelines and Programs for Cervical Cancer Control in Countries of Different Economic Groups: A Narrative Review

Jyoti Sharma et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Screening guidelines and practices differ according to resource availability and continually update as scientific developments take place. In this article, we have reviewed screening guidelines and programs for cervical cancer prevention in selected countries belonging to different economic groups viz high income, middle income, and low income. We have selected six countries - the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), India, South Africa, Bangladesh, and Malawi. Considerable differences are observed across the health systems. Countries with established screening guidelines complemented by organised nationwide programs or insurance practices have much better screening rates. Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) DNA testing is currently the test of choice in the majority of settings for cervical cancer screening due to its higher sensitivity (up to 90-100%) and longer screening intervals (three to five years). It is also cost-effective, less dependent on operator expertise, and suitable for all settings as compared to a Pap smear test or visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). Self-sampling of HPV can further help to improve screening coverage by increasing opportunities of reaching to women who would otherwise not participate in screening programs. Resource-constrained countries recommend VIA-based screening in their national programs due to its low cost. The share of cervical cancer is higher in middle and low-income countries as they have lower screening coverage, compared to high-income countries. The main barriers faced in the implementation of the program in low-income countries (LICs) are pertaining to the health system, patient-specific challenges, and healthcare provider-specific challenges.

Keywords: barriers; cervical cancer; guidelines; health system challenges; implementation; program; screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Screening intervals and primary recommended tests in national programs/guidelines of different countries
Source: Compiled from multiple sources Abbreviations: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) American Cancer Society (ACS) National Health Service-Cervical Screening Programme (NHS-CSP) Ministry of Health (MoH) DoH (Department of Health)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Globocan: Cancer today, International agency for research on cancer. [ May; 2023 ];https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home 2020 21:2023.
    1. Cervical cancer in low and middle-income countries. Hull R, Mbele M, Makhafola T, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32782524/ Oncol Lett. 2020;20:2058–2074. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Satterwhite CL, Torrone E, Meites E, et al. Sex Transm Dis. 2013;40:187–193. - PubMed
    1. Cervical cancer screening - the challenges of complete pathways of care in low-income countries: focus on Malawi. Cubie HA, Campbell C. Womens Health (Lond) 2020;16:1745506520914804. - PMC - PubMed
    1. HPV vaccine development: a case study of prevention and politics. Grimes JL. https://iubmb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/bmb.2006.49403402148. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2006;34:148–154. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources