Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Sep;47(3):520-526.
doi: 10.1007/s12639-023-01595-6. Epub 2023 May 18.

Route of dexamethasone administration influences parasite burden in Strongyloides hyperinfection model

Affiliations

Route of dexamethasone administration influences parasite burden in Strongyloides hyperinfection model

Luisa Queiroz Corrêa et al. J Parasit Dis. 2023 Sep.

Abstract

Rodents infected with Strongyloides venezuelensis are experimental models applied to strongyloidiasis research. This study evaluated oral and subcutaneous dexamethasone (DEX) treatments to establish immunosuppression in an experimental model of Strongyloides hyperinfection. Rattus norvegicus Wistar were divided: G I (-): untreated and uninfected animals, G II (+): untreated and infected, G III (o -) orally treated and uninfected, G IV (o +) orally treated and infected, G V (sc -) subcutaneously treated and uninfected, G VI (sc +) subcutaneously treated and infected. For oral administration, DEX was diluted in sterile water (5 µg/ml) and made available to the animals on intervals in experimental days - 5-0, 8-13 and 21-26. For subcutaneous administration, animals received daily injections of DEX disodium phosphate (2 mg/kg). Infection was established by the subcutaneous inoculation of 3000 S. venezuelensis filarioid larvae. Groups were evaluated by egg per gram of feces and parasite females counts and IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a detection. GIV (o +) had egg peaks count on days 13 and 26 and maintained egg elimination until the last experimental day. Parasitic females recovery at day 30 was significantly higher in G IV (o +) when compared to G VI (sc +). Levels of IgG, IgG1 and IgG2a of all groups, except the positive control GII (+), were below the detection threshold. Pharmacological immunosuppression induced by oral administration of DEX produced high parasitic burden, and is a noninvasive method, useful to establish immunosuppression in strongyloidiasis hyperinfection model in rats.

Keywords: Dexamethasone; Experimental infection; Hyperinfection; Immunosuppression; Strongyloides venezuelensis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Egg per gram of feces (EPG) count on days 5, 7, 8, 13, 21, 26 and 30 of S. venezuelensis infected animal groups. Values are expressed in median and interquartile range. G II (+): untreated (≤). G IV (o +): dexamethasone orally treated (). G VI (sc +): dexamethasone subcutaneously treated (ρ). Differences were statistically significant when p < 0.05. The intergroup comparisons are represented by symbols: * G II (+) vs. G IV (o +), # GII (+) vs. G VI (sc +), & G IV (o +) vs. G VI (sc +)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Strongyloides venezuelensis parasitic females count at day 30. Values are expressed in median and interquartile range. G II (+): untreated and infected animals. G IV (o +): orally treated and infected animals. G VI (sc +): subcutaneously treated and infected animals. Differences were statistically significant when p < 0.05. The intergroup comparisons are represented by symbols: & G IV (o +) vs. G VI (sc +)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Detection of total IgG (A), IgG1 (B), IgG2a (C) antibodies on days 0, 8, 13, 21 and 30 by indirect ELISA. Data expressed in ELISA Index (EI) and values > 1 are considered positive. G I (−): untreated and uninfected animals. G II (+): untreated and infected animals. G III (o −): orally treated and uninfected animals. G IV (o +): orally treated and infected animals. G V (sc −): subcutaneously treated and uninfected animals. G VI (sc +): subcutaneously treated and infected animals

Similar articles

References

    1. Breloer M, Abraham D. Strongyloides infection in rodents: immune response and immune regulation. Parasitol. 2017;144(3):295–315. doi: 10.1017/S0031182016000111. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buonfrate D, Bisanzio D, Giorli G, Odermatt P, Fürst T, Greenaway C, French M, Reithinger R, Gobbi F, Montresor A, Bisoffi Z. The global prevalence of Strongyloides stercoralis infection. Pathogens. 2020;9(6):468. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9060468. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carvalho EFG, Neto de Sousa JE, Gonçalves AL, da Cunha-Junior JP, Costa-Cruz JM. Immunoblotting using Strongyloides venezuelensis larvae, parthenogenetic females or eggs extracts for the diagnosis of experimentally infected immunosuppressed rats. Exp Parasitol. 2015;157:117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2015.07.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cato AC, Nestl A, Mink S. Rapid actions of steroid receptors in cellular signaling pathways. Sci STKE. 2002;138:re9. doi: 10.1126/stke.2002.138.re9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chaves LA, Gonçalves AL, Paula FM, Silva NM, Silva CV, Costa-Cruz JM, Freitas MA. Comparison of parasitological, immunological and molecular methods for evaluation of fecal samples of immunosuppressed rats experimentally infected with Strongyloides venezuelensis. Parasitol. 2015;142(14):1715–1721. doi: 10.1017/S0031182015001298. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources