Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep;34(8):5898-5920.
doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

Artificial Intelligence and COVID-19: A Systematic umbrella review and roads ahead

Affiliations
Review

Artificial Intelligence and COVID-19: A Systematic umbrella review and roads ahead

Amina Adadi et al. J King Saud Univ Comput Inf Sci. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has played a substantial role in the response to the challenges posed by the current pandemic. The growing interest in using AI to handle Covid-19 issues has accelerated the pace of AI research and resulted in an exponential increase in articles and review studies within a very short period of time. Hence, it is becoming challenging to explore the large corpus of academic publications dedicated to the global health crisis. Even with the presence of systematic review studies, given their number and diversity, identifying trends and research avenues beyond the pandemic should be an arduous task. We conclude therefore that after the one-year mark of the declaration of Covid-19 as a pandemic, the accumulated scientific contribution lacks two fundamental aspects: Knowledge synthesis and Future projections. In contribution to fill this void, this paper is a (i) synthesis study and (ii) foresight exercise. The synthesis study aims to provide the scholars a consolidation of findings and a knowledge synthesis through a systematic review of the reviews (umbrella review) studying AI applications against Covid-19. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and other preprint sources from 1st December 2019 to 1st June 2021 for eligible reviews. The literature search and screening process resulted in 45 included reviews. Our findings reveal patterns, relationships, and trends in the AI research community response to the pandemic. We found that in the space of few months, the research objectives of the literature have developed rapidly from identifying potential AI applications to evaluating current uses of intelligent systems. Only few reviews have adopted the meta-analysis as a study design. Moreover, a clear dominance of the medical theme and the DNN methods has been observed in the reported AI applications. Based on its constructive systematic umbrella review, this work conducts a foresight exercise that tries to envision the post-Covid-19 research landscape of the AI field. We see seven key themes of research that may be an outcome of the present crisis and which advocate a more sustainable and responsible form of intelligent systems. We set accordingly a post-pandemic research agenda articulated around these seven drivers. The results of this study can be useful for the AI research community to obtain a holistic view of the current literature and to help prioritize research needs as we are heading toward the new normal.

Keywords: Artificial Intelligence; Covid-19; Deep learning; Foresight analysis; Machine learning; Robotic; Umbrella review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of the selection process of the included reviews.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Journals profiling according to the covered subject areas.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Goal distribution of research questions.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Scope distribution of research questions.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Scale distribution of research questions.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Size of the included reviews → Significant difference in the sample size was observed between the two subgroups of the review type (p = 0,0493, t test).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Keywords mapping of the included reviews.
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Taxonomy of AI applications taxonomies.
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Mapping of AI applications with data types and AI methods → Differences between AI method frequencies are significant (p = 0.0003, Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Test).
Fig. 10
Fig. 10
Distribution of the proposed taxonomic classes → Differences between studies conceptualization frequencies are significant (p = 0.0008, Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Test).
Fig. 11
Fig. 11
Similarity comparison between the taxonomic classes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aalst V.D., Bichler M., Heinzl A. Robotic process automation. Bus Inf. Syst. Eng. 2018;60(2018):269–272. doi: 10.1007/s12599-018-0542-4. - DOI
    1. Abd-Alrazaq A., Alajlani M., Alhuwail D., Schneider J., Al-Kuwari S., Shah Z., Hamdi M., Househ M. Artificial Intelligence in the Fight Against COVID-19: Scoping Review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020;22(12):e20756. doi: 10.2196/20756. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abd-Alrazaq A., Schneider J., Mifsud B., Alam T., Househ M., Hamdi M., Shah Z. A Comprehensive overview of the COVID-19 Literature: Machine learning-based bibliometric analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021;23(3):e23703. doi: 10.2196/23703. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adadi A. A survey on data-efficient algorithms in big data era. J. Big Data. 2021;8(1) doi: 10.1186/s40537-021-00419-9. - DOI
    1. Adadi A., Berrada M. Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) IEEE Access. 2018;6:52138–52160.

LinkOut - more resources