Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 13:10:1198121.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1198121. eCollection 2023.

New vegetable varieties of Brassica rapa and Brassica napus with modified glucosinolate content obtained by mass selection approach

S Coves  1 , P Soengas  1 , P Velasco  1 , J C Fernández  1 , M E Cartea  1
Affiliations

New vegetable varieties of Brassica rapa and Brassica napus with modified glucosinolate content obtained by mass selection approach

S Coves et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

Background: Glucosinolates (GSLs) constitute a characteristic group of secondary metabolites present in the Brassica genus. These compounds confer resistance to pests and diseases. Moreover, they show allelopathic and anticarcinogenic effects. All those effects are dependent on the chemical structure of the GSL. The modification of the content of specific GSLs would allow obtaining varieties with enhanced resistance and/or improved health benefits. Moreover, the attainment of varieties with the same genetic background but with divergent GSLs concentration will prompt the undertaking of studies on their biological effects.

Objective and methods: The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two divergent mass selection programs to modify GSL content in the leaves of two Brassica species: nabicol (Brassica napus L.), selected by glucobrassicanapin (GBN), and nabiza (Brassica rapa L.), selected by gluconapin (GNA) through several selection cycles using cromatographic analysis.

Results: The response to selection fitted a linear regression model with no signs of variability depletion for GSL modification in either direction, but with higher efficiency in reducing the selected GSL than in the increasing. The selection was also effective in other parts of the plant, suggesting that there is a GSL translocation in the plant or a modification in their synthesis pathway that is not-organ specific. There was an indirect response of selection in other GSL; thus this information should be considered when designing breeding programs. Finally, populations obtained by selection have the same agronomic performance or even better than the original population.

Conclusion: Therefore, mass selection seems to be a good method to modify the content of specific GSL in Brassica crops.

Keywords: divergent selection; landraces; plant defense; quality crops; secondary metabolites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Linear regressions of GNA on selection cycles in Brassica napus (A) and GBN on selection cycles in Brassica rapa (B) in the three parts of the plant studied.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Linear regressions of other GSL with an indirect response to GBN selection cycles in Brassica napus in leaves (A) and seeds (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Linear regressions of other GSL with an indirect response to GNA selection cycles in Brassica rapa in leaves (A,B), tops (C–E) and seeds (F–H).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Cartea ME, Lema M, Francisco M, Velasco P. Basic information on vegetable Brassica crops. Sadowski J., Kole C. (Eds.). Genetics, genomics and breeding of vegetable brassicas. Genetics, genomics and breeding of crop plants (2016). 1–33. Sci. Publ, Enfield.
    1. Food and agriculture organisation of the United Nations . FAOSTAT statistical database (2020). Available at: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL
    1. Rosa EAS. Chemical composition. Gómez-Campo C. (Ed.). Biology of Brassica coenospecies. Elsevier Science BV, Amsterdam: (1999) 315–357, doi: 10.1016/S0168-7972(99)80011-5 - DOI
    1. Podsędek A. Natural antioxidants and antioxidant capacity of Brassica vegetables: a review. LWT - Food Sci Technol. (2007) 40:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2005.07.023 - DOI
    1. Singh J, Upadhyay AK, Prasad K, Bahadur A, Rai M. Variability of carotenes, vitamin C, E and phenolics in Brassica vegetables. J Food Compos Anal. (2007) 20:106–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2006.08.002 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources