Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 13:10:1199047.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1199047. eCollection 2023.

Safety and performance of the Vienna self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve system: 6-month results of the VIVA first-in-human feasibility study

Affiliations

Safety and performance of the Vienna self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve system: 6-month results of the VIVA first-in-human feasibility study

Kasparas Briedis et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Background: The novel Vienna TAVI system is repositionable and retrievable, already pre-mounted on the delivery system, eliminating the need for assembly and crimping of the device prior to valve implantation.

Aims: The purpose of this first-in-human feasibility study was to determine the safety, feasibility, clinical and hemodynamic performance of the Vienna TAVI system at 6-month follow-up. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04861805).

Methods: This is a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, single-center, first-stage FIH feasibility study, which is followed by a second-stage pivotal, multicenter, multinational study in symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (SAS). The first-stage FIH study evaluated the safety and feasibility, clinical and hemodynamic performance of the device in 10 patients with SAS based on recommendations by the VARC-2.

Results: All patients were alive at 3-month follow-up. 1 non-cardiovascular mortality was reported 5 months after implantation. There were no new cerebrovascular events, life-threatening bleeding or conduction disturbances observed at 6-month follow-up. The mean AV gradient significantly decreased from 48.7 ± 10.8 to 7.32 ± 2.0 mmHg and mean AVA increased from 0.75 ± 0.18 to 2.16 ± 0.42 cm2 (p < 0.00001). There was no incidence of moderate or severe total AR observed. In the QoL questionnaires, the patients reported a significant improvement from the baseline 12-KCCQ mean score 58 ± 15 to 76 ± 20. NYHA functional class improved in two patients, remained unchanged in one patient. There was an increase in mean 6-min-walk distance from baseline 285 ± 97 to 347 ± 57 m.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that using Vienna TAVI system has favourable and sustained 6-month safety and performance outcomes in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.

Keywords: TAVI; VIVA trial; Vienna TAVI; Vienna aortic valve; aortic stenosis; dry-pericardium; first-in-human (FIH); pre-mounted TAVI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

KB is a consultant and proctor for P+F Products+Features GmbH and has received honoraria from P+F Products+Features GmbH. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Vienna aortic valve in outflow view (A), inflow view (B) and Side view (C).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study flow chart. Non-CV, non-cardiovascular.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Echocardiographic parameters from baseline to 6 months: mean aortic valve gradient and mean effective orifice area.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Echocardiographic parameters from discharge to 6 months: total aortic regurgitation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
12-KCCQ mean score and NYHA classification at baseline and 6 months. In the Quality-of-Life questionnaires the patients reported a significant improvement, also NYHA functional class improved in two patients, remained unchanged in one patient, was not reported in one patient due to prolonged recovery, and one patient died due to non-cardiovascular cause. KCCQ-12, 12-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; NYHA, New York Heart Association.

References

    1. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Tron C, Bauer F, Agatiello C, Sebagh L, et al. Early experience with percutaneous transcatheter implantation of heart valve prosthesis for the treatment of end-stage inoperable patients with calcific aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2004) 43:698–703. 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, Miller DC, Moses JW, Svensson LG, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. (2011) 364:2187–98. 10.1056/NEJMoa1103510 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, Makkar RR, Svensson LG, Kodali SK, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. (2016) 374:1609–20. 10.1056/NEJMoa1514616 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Mumtaz M, Gada H, O’Hair D, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. (2019) 380:1706–15. 10.1056/NEJMoa1816885 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bowdish ME, D’Agostino RS, Thourani VH, Schwann TA, Krohn C, Desai N, et al. STS adult cardiac surgery database: 2021 update on outcomes, quality, and research. Ann Thorac Surg. (2021) 111:1770–80. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.03.043 - DOI - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources