Acquired bilateral facial palsy: a systematic review on aetiologies and management
- PMID: 37523065
- PMCID: PMC10576676
- DOI: 10.1007/s00415-023-11897-7
Acquired bilateral facial palsy: a systematic review on aetiologies and management
Abstract
Objective: To systematically review the published cases of bilateral facial palsy (BFP) to gather evidence on the clinical assessment and management of this pathology.
Methods: Following PRISMA statement recommendations, 338 abstracts were screened independently by two authors. Inclusion criteria were research articles of human patients affected by BFP, either central or peripheral; English, Italian, French or Spanish language; availability of the abstract, while exclusion criteria were topics unrelated to FP, and mention of unilateral or congenital FP. Only full-text articles reporting the diagnostic work-up, the management, and the prognosis of the BFP considered for further specific data analysis.
Results: A total of 143 articles were included, resulting a total of 326 patients with a mean age of 36 years. The most common type of the paralysis was peripheral (91.7%), and the autoimmune disease was the most frequent aetiology (31.3%). The mean time of onset after first symptoms was 12 days and most patients presented with a grade higher than III. Associated symptoms in idiopathic BFP were mostly non-specific. The most frequently positive laboratory exams were cerebrospinal fluid analysis, autoimmune screening and peripheral blood smear, and the most performed imaging was MRI. Most patients (74%) underwent exclusive medical treatment, while a minority were selected for a surgical or combined approach. Finally, in more than half of cases a complete bilateral recovery (60.3%) was achieved.
Conclusions: BFP is a disabling condition. If a correct diagnosis is formulated, possibilities to recover are elevated and directly correlated to the administration of an adequate treatment.
Keywords: Acquired facial palsy; Bilateral facial palsy; Facial function; Facial nerve; Facial paralysis.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Gevers G, Lemkens P. Bilateral simultaneous facial paralysis–differential diagnosis and treatment options. A case report and review of literature. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 2003;57(2):139–146. - PubMed
-
- Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.PMID:33781348;PMCID:PMC8008539. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Teller DC, Murphy TP. Bilateral facial paralysis: a case presentation and literature review. J Otolaryngol. 1992;21(1):44–47. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
