Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 31;47(1):81.
doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01980-x.

An AI-Enabled Dynamic Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients with ECG and CXR Integration

Affiliations

An AI-Enabled Dynamic Risk Stratification for Emergency Department Patients with ECG and CXR Integration

Yu-Hsuan Jamie Chen et al. J Med Syst. .

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) triage scale determines the priority of patient care and foretells the prognosis. However, the information retrieved from the initial assessment is limited, hindering the risk identification accuracy of triage. Therefore, we sought to develop a 'dynamic' triage system as secondary screening, using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to integrate information from initial assessment data and subsequent examinations. This retrospective cohort study included 134,112 ED visits with at least one electrocardiography (ECG) and chest X-ray (CXR) in a medical center from 2012 to 2022. Additionally, an independent community hospital provided 45,614 ED visits as an external validation set. We trained an eXtreme gradient boosting (XGB) model using initial assessment data to predict all-cause mortality in 7 days. Two deep learning models (DLMs) using ECG and CXR were trained to stratify mortality risks. The dynamic triage levels were based on output from the XGB-triage and DLMs from ECG and CXR. During the internal and external validation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the XGB-triage model was >0.866; furthermore, the AUCs of DLMs using ECG and CXR were >0.862 and >0.886, respectively. The dynamic triage scale provided a higher C-index (0.914-0.920 vs. 0.827-0.843) than the original one and demonstrated better predictive ability for 5-year mortality, 30-day ED revisit, and 30-day discharge. The AI-based risk scale provides a more accurate and dynamic stratification of mortality risk in ED patients, particularly in identifying patients who tend to be overlooked due to atypical symptoms.

Keywords: Artificial intelligence; Chest X-ray; Deep learning; Electrocardiogram; Emergency department; Triage scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N. Farrohknia, M. Castren, A. Ehrenberg, L. Lind, S. Oredsson, H. Jonsson, K. Asplund, K.E. Goransson, Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence, Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 19 (2011) 42. - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. C.M. Fernandes, P. Tanabe, N. Gilboy, L.A. Johnson, R.S. McNair, A.M. Rosenau, P. Sawchuk, D.A. Thompson, D.A. Travers, N. Bonalumi, R.E. Suter, Five-level triage: a report from the ACEP/ENA Five-level Triage Task Force, J Emerg Nurs 31(1) (2005) 39-50; quiz 118.
    1. P.J. Pronovost, D.C. Angus, T. Dorman, K.A. Robinson, T.T. Dremsizov, T.L. Young, Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review, Jama 288(17) (2002) 2151-2162. - DOI - PubMed
    1. S. Jones, C. Moulton, S. Swift, P. Molyneux, S. Black, N. Mason, R. Oakley, C. Mann, Association between delays to patient admission from the emergency department and all-cause 30-day mortality, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ 39(3) (2022) 168-173. - DOI - PubMed
    1. N. Gilboy, T. Tanabe, D. Travers, A.M. Rosenau, Emergency Severity Index (ESI): A Triage Tool for Emergency Department Care, 4th ed., Emergency Nurses Association2020.

LinkOut - more resources