Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 31;18(7):e0289152.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289152. eCollection 2023.

RISK aversion in Italian forensic and non-forensic patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

Affiliations

RISK aversion in Italian forensic and non-forensic patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders

Nicola Canessa et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Goal-directed decision-making is a central component of the broader reward and motivation system, and requires the ability to dynamically integrate both positive and negative feedback from the environment in order to maximize rewards and minimize losses over time. Altered decision-making processes, in which individuals fail to consider the negative consequences of their decisions on both themselves and others, may play a role in driving antisocial behaviour.

Aim: The main study aim was to investigate possible differences in loss and risk aversion across matched patients, all with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD), but who varied according to whether they had a history of serious interpersonal violence or not, and a sample of healthy controls with no history of violence.

Results: The sample included 14 forensic and 21 non-forensic patients with SSD, and 41 healthy controls. Among the three decision-making variables under investigation, risk aversion was the only significant predictor of membership of the three groups, with greater risk aversion among non-forensic patients with SSD compared to healthy controls. No differences were observed across groups in loss aversion and choice consistency.

Conclusions: This evidence suggests a new potential treatment target for rehabilitative measures aimed at achieving functional improvements in patients with SSD by selectively leveraging the neuro-cognitive processing of reward.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Liu X, Hairston J, Schrier M, Fan J. Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2011. Apr;35(5):1219–1236. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pessiglione M, Delgado MR. The good, the bad and the brain: Neural correlates of appetitive and aversive values underlying decision making. Curr Opin Behav Sci 2015. Oct;5:78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.08.006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Canessa N, Crespi C, Baud-Bovy G, Dodich A, Falini A, Antonellis G, et al.. Neural markers of loss aversion in resting-state brain activity. Neuroimage 2017. Feb 1;146:257–265. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.050 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Canessa N, Crespi C, Motterlini M, Baud-Bovy G, Chierchia G, Pantaleo G, et al.. The functional and structural neural basis of individual differences in loss aversion. J Neurosci 2013. Sep 4;33(36):14307–14317. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0497-13.2013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arioli M, Cattaneo Z, Parimbelli S, Canessa N. Relational vs representational social cognitive processing: a coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023;18(1):nsad003. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types