Results of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation in the Second Eye of Monofocal Pseudophakic Patients: A Pilot Study
- PMID: 37523425
- DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000622
Results of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation in the Second Eye of Monofocal Pseudophakic Patients: A Pilot Study
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the visual results and patient satisfaction after implantation of an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) in the second eye of patients implanted previously with a monofocal IOL in the first eye.
Methods: The medical records and self-reported questionnaires from patients who were implanted with monofocal IOLs in the first eye and EDOF IOLs in the second eye (group A) and from patients implanted bilaterally with EDOF IOLs (group B) were compared for visual acuity (VA), spectacle independence, patient satisfaction, and photic phenomena.
Results: Group A (23 eyes of 23 patients) had similar distance uncorrected VA and intermediate uncorrected VA compared with group B (72 eyes of 36 patients) (0.03±0.05 vs. 0.04±0.16; P =0.136 and 0.660, respectively). There was a tendency toward a better near uncorrected VA in group A compared with group B (0.15±0.14 vs. 0.23±0.17; P =0.074). Patients' perception of their VA was similar between groups. Spectacle independence for distance vision was reported by 16/17 (94.1%) and 35/36 (97.2%) patients ( P =0.543), 13/17 (76.5%) and 32/36 (88.9%) patients ( P =0.252) for intermediate vision, and 4/17 (23.6%) and 22/36 (61.1%) patients for near vision ( P =0.011), in groups A and B, respectively. There was no difference in complaints of photic phenomena between groups.
Conclusions: Patients previously implanted with a monofocal IOL in 1 eye who are interested in improving their spectacle independence can be considered for an EDOF IOL implantation in the second eye and may have similar results to those implanted bilaterally with EDOF IOLs.
Copyright © 2023 Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Asia-Pacific Academy of Ophthalmology.
Conflict of interest statement
E.I.A.: Hanita Lenses—Consultant. Biotechnology General (Israel) Ltd—Consultant. Vision Care Technologies—Research fee, options holder. APX Ophthalmology—Founder, CMO. IOPtima—Share holder. VisiDome—Founder, CMO. CorNeat—Share holder. G.K.: Hanita Lenses—Consultant. CorNeat—Consultant. Johnson and Johnson—Consultant. The remaining authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to declare.
References
-
- Maxwell WA, Cionni RJ, Lehmann RP, et al. Functional outcomes after bilateral implantation of apodized diffractive aspheric acrylic intraocular lenses with a +3.0 or +4.0 diopter addition power randomized multicenter clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:2054–2061.
-
- Fine IH, Hoffman RS. Refractive aspects of cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1996;7:21–25.
-
- Baig R, Chaudhry AT, Kukreja S, et al. Patients’ satisfaction and spectacle independence after cataract surgery with multifocal intraocular lens implantation in a tertiary care hospital. J Pak Med Assoc. 2016;66:745–747.
-
- Close T, Olsen L. Corydon Contrast sensitivity in patients with a new type of multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990;16:42–46.
-
- Rosen E, Alió JL, Dick HB, et al. Efficacy and safety of multifocal intraocular lenses following cataract and refractive lens exchange: metaanalysis of peer-reviewed publications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:310–328.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
