Managing valvular pathology during LVAD implantation
- PMID: 37525709
- PMCID: PMC10387021
- DOI: 10.1007/s12055-023-01567-8
Managing valvular pathology during LVAD implantation
Abstract
Since the time of their invention, implantable continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have improved the quality of life and extended survival for patients with advanced heart failure. The decision surgeons and their physician colleagues make with these patients to undergo implantation must come with full understanding of the immediate, short-term, and long-term implications of such a life-changing procedure. The presence of pathology regarding the aortic, mitral, and tricuspid valves introduces particularly complex problems for the surgical treatment strategy. Concomitant valve repair or replacement increases cardiopulmonary bypass and cross clamp times, and could potentially lead to worse outcomes in the perioperative setting. Following perioperative recovery, valvular pathology may worsen or arise de novo given the often drastic immediate physiologic changes in blood flow, septal function, and, over time, ventricular remodeling. Over the past two decades, there has been vast improvement in the device manufacturing, surgical techniques, and medical management surrounding LVAD implantation. Yet, addressing concomitant valvular pathology remains a complex question with no perfect solutions. This review aims to briefly describe the evolution of approach to valvular pathology in the LVAD patient and offer our opinion and treatment rationale.
Keywords: Aortic valve; Heart failure; Mitral valve; Tricuspid valve.
© Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Yuzefpolskaya MSS, Houston BA, Robinson MR, Gosev I, Reyentovich AKD, Cantor R, Jorde UP, Kirklin JK, Pagani FD, D’Alessandro DA. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2022 Annual Report: Focus on 2018 Heart Transplant Allocation System. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;115:311–27. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.11.023. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Goldstein DJ, Meyns B, Xie R, Cowger J, Pettit S, Nakatani T, et al. Third Annual Report From the ISHLT Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Registry: a comparison of centrifugal and axial continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38:352–363. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.02.004. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Loforte A, de By T, Gliozzi G, Schönrath F, Mariani C, Netuka I, et al. Impact of concomitant cardiac valvular surgery during implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a European registry for patients with mechanical circulatory support (EUROMACS) analysis. Artif Organs. 2022;46:813–826. doi: 10.1111/aor.14143. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous